Back to @LalitKModi's profile

Lalit Kumar Modi engagement report

@LalitKModi - 3.5M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 3.5M followers
Per impression
0.203%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.203% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.259% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 81% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,566 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,566 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,933 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link81% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 81% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 212 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 2026156x their median

    Lalit Modi enjoying party with Kanika Kapoor and Lauren Short at ROKA Mykonos beach Bro is living his life better than most of the youths While half the generation is stuck in traffic and EMI stress, this man is vibing under Greek sun with champagne and company. Zero FOMO, pure main-character energy.

    2.4K222110461.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202667x their median

    How did Tendulkar, manage to play cricket sans a spine? https://t.co/gNoO6dPSCO

    985119871841K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202664x their median

    Join the millions of people worldwide already using Revolut to send, spend, and save smarter. What are you waiting for? ⚡️

    1.1K4801154M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202636x their median

    FOR THE RECORD. I am NOT the Lalit Modi involved in the Vasant Vihar / BDR Builders property or arbitration case being reported by several media outlets. The court record identifies that individual as Lalit Modi, son of J.R. Modi, resident of 32 Pashchimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. I am Lalit Kumar Modi — Founder of the IPL. Some publications have wrongly attached my photograph, biography and identity to another individual’s litigation. I request all media organisations, search platforms and databases carrying this error to correct their records immediately. Same name. Different person. Get the facts right. — Lalit Modi Founder, IPL @ANI @PTI_News

    556493010115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202625x their median

    https://t.co/mR0C8DILUm https://t.co/N0UK2Gml0M

    3842232926K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202610x their median

    Rohit Sharma camp turns against Ajit Agarkar: Mumbai lobby moves to oust chief selector - CricBlogger https://t.co/TpoMHJlzjz

    157138343K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.5x their median

    Rajiv Shukla gets BCCI conflict-of-interest notice I am glad the bcci ombudsman is finally taking notice of the Rajiv Shukla. Hopefully this will get cricket in utter Pradesh a chance to finally clean up the corruption and get rid of all the crooks https://t.co/zXc6zAHW1F

    12384027K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20267.1x their median

    THE COACH IS NOT THE CALENDAR. Gautam Gambhir is a dear friend, but my support for him today is not based on friendship. It is based on fairness, experience and cricketing common sense. Indian cricket has developed a dangerous habit: celebrate people when they win, then look for one individual to publicly sacrifice when results turn against us. One difficult run does not suddenly make Gautam a poor coach. It does not erase his achievements, his cricketing intelligence, his leadership or the winning mentality he has brought to every team he has represented. Should his selections and tactics be questioned? Absolutely. That comes with the job. Gautam himself would expect nothing less. But before blaming only the coach, perhaps we should also question the people constructing these punishing schedules. Our players came through an intense IPL season and were immediately pushed into international cricket, different countries, different conditions and back-to-back series—with inadequate time to rest, recover, practise or mentally reset. Players are not machines. Coaches are not magicians. You cannot create exhaustion administratively and then blame the dressing room when performance suffers. India must decide what matters most. The IPL should remain the priority and the centrepiece of the cricketing calendar. ICC tournaments and meaningful Test cricket must be protected. Bilateral series should be selective, competitive and commercially relevant. Meaningless one-day series that add little beyond television inventory should be scrapped. More cricket does not automatically mean better cricket. Gautam must be judged over a full cycle, not condemned after one bad passage. Review the cricketing decisions—but also review the calendar, the travel, the recovery periods and the workload placed upon our players. Stand by the coach. Protect the players. Fix the schedule. Then demand results. I stand firmly with my friend Gautam Gambhir. Lalit Modi Founder, IPL

    891029075K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.4x their median

    Happy Janamashtmi 🙏🏽🫶🏽 https://t.co/EAL2IvUA1T

    1055605.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20266.3x their median

    Before the world knew me, you held my whole world in your arms. Whatever life brings, that bond remains beyond words. Wishing you health, peace and happiness today and always. Happy Birthday, Mom . ❤️ @DrBinaModi https://t.co/gsFsd530Qs

    88914242K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.203% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.259% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 81% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 156x its own typical post.

What is Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate on X?
Lalit Kumar Modi (@LalitKModi) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,510,143 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,566 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LalitKModi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LalitKModi post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going