PlayerSells
Back to @LalitKModi's profile

Lalit Kumar Modi engagement report

@LalitKModi - 3.5M followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 3.5M followers
Per impression
0.159%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
0.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.159% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.431% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 117x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bcci, #cricketfan, #cricketlovers.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #bcci, #cricketfan, #cricketlovers.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 11,249 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.05%
p750.336%
p902.48%
p99322.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 11,249 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 358,007 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.05%
75th percentile0.336%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile322.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link66% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%7.9K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 66% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 245 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 2026117x their median

    Lalit Modi enjoying party with Kanika Kapoor and Lauren Short at ROKA Mykonos beach Bro is living his life better than most of the youths While half the generation is stuck in traffic and EMI stress, this man is vibing under Greek sun with champagne and company. Zero FOMO, pure main-character energy.

    2.4K222110461.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202650x their median

    How did Tendulkar, manage to play cricket sans a spine? https://t.co/gNoO6dPSCO

    985119871841K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20267.5x their median

    Rohit Sharma camp turns against Ajit Agarkar: Mumbai lobby moves to oust chief selector - CricBlogger https://t.co/TpoMHJlzjz

    156138343K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 20265.3x their median

    THE COACH IS NOT THE CALENDAR. Gautam Gambhir is a dear friend, but my support for him today is not based on friendship. It is based on fairness, experience and cricketing common sense. Indian cricket has developed a dangerous habit: celebrate people when they win, then look for one individual to publicly sacrifice when results turn against us. One difficult run does not suddenly make Gautam a poor coach. It does not erase his achievements, his cricketing intelligence, his leadership or the winning mentality he has brought to every team he has represented. Should his selections and tactics be questioned? Absolutely. That comes with the job. Gautam himself would expect nothing less. But before blaming only the coach, perhaps we should also question the people constructing these punishing schedules. Our players came through an intense IPL season and were immediately pushed into international cricket, different countries, different conditions and back-to-back series—with inadequate time to rest, recover, practise or mentally reset. Players are not machines. Coaches are not magicians. You cannot create exhaustion administratively and then blame the dressing room when performance suffers. India must decide what matters most. The IPL should remain the priority and the centrepiece of the cricketing calendar. ICC tournaments and meaningful Test cricket must be protected. Bilateral series should be selective, competitive and commercially relevant. Meaningless one-day series that add little beyond television inventory should be scrapped. More cricket does not automatically mean better cricket. Gautam must be judged over a full cycle, not condemned after one bad passage. Review the cricketing decisions—but also review the calendar, the travel, the recovery periods and the workload placed upon our players. Stand by the coach. Protect the players. Fix the schedule. Then demand results. I stand firmly with my friend Gautam Gambhir. Lalit Modi Founder, IPL

    881029075K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20263.9x their median

    I am really looking forward to returning to India after a long long time. Stay well and stay safe 🙏🏽

    726133120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20263.4x their median

    What is your answer to this mr dalal @ShuklaRajiv https://t.co/dQUePNFi87

    34245016K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20263.4x their median

    Sixteen years later… I don’t celebrate the time that was lost. I celebrate the truth that endured. Thank you to those who never stopped believing. Satyamev Jayate. 🙏🏽 #lalitmodi #india #cricket #bcci @IPL @ani_trending @ptinews_multimedia #fema https://t.co/fEIgQivTUw

    63511211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20263.0x their median

    Victory…. https://t.co/04h1wIJxqP

    6246026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.9x their median

    https://t.co/YsDjfxcXd7 https://t.co/DwpVnNxlZ0

    5955020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.8x their median

    Finally a notice to @ShuklaRajiv from justice Arun mishra. About time the crooks are removed from this beautiful game of cricket. https://t.co/FVbIUYsg8l

    5565127K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bcci#cricketfan#cricketlovers#hightlight#icc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 3.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.159% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.431% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 66% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 117x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bcci, #cricketfan, #cricketlovers.

What is Lalit Kumar Modi's engagement rate on X?
Lalit Kumar Modi (@LalitKModi) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,512,193 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Lalit Kumar Modi sits below the 10th percentile of the 11,249 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LalitKModi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LalitKModi post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going