Back to @LacyHimself's profile

Lacy engagement report

@LacyHimself - 633K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.579%
of 633K followers
Per impression
1.61%
227K views on a typical post
Reach
36.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
143 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 3.7K interactions against 633K followers, an engagement rate of 0.579%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 227K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lacy's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.579%, Lacy sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 22, 20266.0x their median

    I want to help up and coming creators achieve their dreams with my streamer university revenue. I will be giving away: - 1 brand new PC - 1 IRL stream phone 2 people who like this tweet and reply with why they deserve it, will win.

    16K1.3K4.9K63611K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20264.6x their median

    FNCS PRO-AM CHAMPION 🥇 IM OFFICIALLY AN FNCS WINNER https://t.co/7A7Mf2CkE5

    16K62934312415K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20264.2x their median

    Man, i cant believe how fast 4 years went by. I gave my life to Fortnite. Today is sadly, the last time i will ever compete. I retire. Thank you to Fortnite for giving me the best years of my life. You will forever have a place in my heart. What can i say, Lacy out.

    14K34764413671K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.0x their median

    Today we make history. Today we beat chained together. https://t.co/wOh4do0G8P

    14K1621639745K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.0x their median

    Decided to try and be healthy today and ate a salad for the first time in 8 months. Been on the toilet for the last 2 hours with stomach cramps & diarrhea, pretty sure i got the parasite Never eating a salad again

    14K1661648604K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.9x their median

    i survived https://t.co/LMKyRa4hVK

    14K136285152.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.8x their median

    From meeting 4 years ago to winning our first FNCS together We are the Champions 🏆 https://t.co/hAiH1AR8rR

    13K43212913416K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.7x their median

    Do the right thing and ban the cheaters from heats. I have all the proof in the world in replies. I deserve to be in grand finals. I'm top 5 in the world. @FNCompetitive @Fortnite

    12K63847111738K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20263.7x their median

    Streamer University 26' 🎓 I wasn't sure how it would turn out for me being in a wheelchair, and was very nervous. We gained over 1 million total new followers and i can't explain how thankful i am for every single person who supported, and especially Kai for the opportunity ❤️ https://t.co/yAmx94fR2R

    13K2831007268K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.6x their median

    i'm leaving CORE. and i will be 175 pounds by january 1st 2027.

    13K188468131.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.7K interactions against 633K followers, an engagement rate of 0.579%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 227K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 35.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

What is Lacy's engagement rate on X?
Lacy (@LacyHimself) has an engagement rate of 0.579%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 633,034 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.579%, Lacy sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LacyHimself have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LacyHimself post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going