Back to @LaPuercaylor's profile

La Tia Puercaylor engagement report

@LaPuercaylor - 184K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.07%
of 184K followers
Per impression
12.3%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
8.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.128%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 12.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 170K interactions, about 87x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vma, #vmas.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tags: #vma, #vmas.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Tia Puercaylor's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.07%, La Tia Puercaylor sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202687x their median

    NOO DOÑA NO SE PUEDE SER CAZADORA Y PRESA AL MISMO TIEMPO https://t.co/98BLfshi9w

    158K11K2506632.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202616x their median

    Taylor dijo que le gusta responderle a los haters que dicen que no sabe escribir y su respuesta es escribir canciones con palabras que tendrían que buscar en un diccionario para poder hablar m*erda de ella después 😭 https://t.co/DHgxynuaHI

    28K3.4K28201256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202611x their median

    “Solo necesitas encontrar a una persona en este mundo que no piense que eres insufrible y tengo un anuncio importante ENCONTRÉ A LA MIA “ https://t.co/T6fl4vGRJ8

    17K4.3K37444164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.6x their median

    OLIVIA LA QUE RESPIRA JUNTO A OLIVIA LA GATA Y TAYLOR RÁPIDO PIDAN UN DESEO https://t.co/PBcHTVrpcx

    15K1.5K122285K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.1x their median

    DIOS MIO TAYLOR SE VE HERMOSA AQUI https://t.co/Ww5EohcWG6

    13K88213100214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20266.6x their median

    taylor's team removed the song from trump's post on tiktok. when the truth comes out its quiet :) https://t.co/CyJbtxYaAZ

    11K1.3K58125274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.1x their median

    Ojala a las 2 am sacara otras 15 canciones como ese 19 de abril de 2024

    8.6K1.4K204355K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20265.0x their median

    Jason Kelce habló sobre la boda de Taylor y Travis y comentó que fue increíble. “La boda fue increíble, un 10 de 10. Probablemente llore más en esta boda que en la mía. Ellos fueron fantásticos en la ceremonia, y estoy feliz por ambos. No he visto ninguna foto real en internet lo cual es increíble hubo miles de personas y no hay nada en internet”

    9.6K249618178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20264.9x their median

    DIOOOS, que les pareció el video? https://t.co/hHekXOywZH

    9.0K4091525687K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.1x their median

    Miss Universo, Fátima Bosch utilizó Shake It Off de Taylor Swift en IG https://t.co/0wYDQDnS0k

    7.7K235621120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vma#vmas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 184K followers, an engagement rate of 1.07%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 12.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 170K interactions, about 87x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #vma, #vmas.

What is La Tia Puercaylor's engagement rate on X?
La Tia Puercaylor (@LaPuercaylor) has an engagement rate of 1.07%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 183,970 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.07%, La Tia Puercaylor sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LaPuercaylor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LaPuercaylor post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going