Back to @LaMMordida's profile

La Manzana Mordida engagement report

@LaMMordida - 177K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 177K followers
Per impression
0.383%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 290 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Manzana Mordida's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, La Manzana Mordida sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.705%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,501 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,721 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.705%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video24% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 24% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 173 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 202624x their median

    Apple ha dejado preparada una puerta bastante más grande de lo que parecía para las IA de terceros en Siri. 👀 En el código de iOS 27 y macOS 27 aparecen dos sistemas distintos. Uno permitiría usar Claude como extensión de Siri, mientras que otro deja que un modelo como GPT-5.6 sustituya al modelo de Apple que interpreta la petición, sin perder la interfaz, la voz ni el acceso a acciones del sistema. Por ahora no es una opción disponible. Apple no ha abierto este acceso a terceros, pero la arquitectura ya está ahí.

    27476353K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202613x their median

    El iPhone 18 Pro Max no lleva el mismo módem en todo el mundo. En España utiliza el nuevo C2 de Apple. En Estados Unidos, la ficha técnica no incluye ese chip y el código de iOS 27 analizado por @itspdfu apunta a que mantiene un módem de Qualcomm. El modelo estadounidense ya era distinto por usar solo eSIM y tener algo más de batería. Ahora también cambia una pieza tan importante como el módem. Habrá que compararlos para saber cuál ofrece mejor cobertura, velocidad y consumo en la práctica.

    15124025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202612x their median

    Instalar iOS 27 y seguir usando el iPhone como siempre es dejar unas cuantas funciones por descubrir. Os enseñamos 10 ajustes y novedades para aprovecharlo mejor, desde separar los volúmenes hasta guardar una foto de un vídeo sin hacer capturas. Y también qué revisar estos primeros días en la batería.

    119182012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202611x their median

    Hay un detalle de iOS 27 que quizá ha pasado algo desapercibido. Apple Intelligence puede resumir lo que ocurre delante de las cámaras de casa, pero el plan de iCloud+ de 2 TB solo permite usar la función en una cámara. Para llevarla a cinco hay que subir al plan de 12 TB, que cuesta 59,99 € al mes. Parece que Apple también empieza a acercarse a la moda de cobrar por las funciones de IA. En este caso no mediante una suscripción nueva, sino limitando el acceso según el plan de iCloud+ que paguemos.

    11565017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20269.1x their median

    Ya está disponible iOS 27. Ahora toca descubrir todo lo que ha cambiado, porque algunas novedades no las vais a encontrar a simple vista. Repasamos sus cambios, os enseñamos cómo aprovecharlos y hablamos de rendimiento y batería frente a iOS 26. https://t.co/mKejfkj5Ck

    94105024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.6x their median

    En unas horas Apple lanzará iOS 27 y podéis ir con los deberes hechos. 👀 Hemos preparado un análisis completo con sus novedades, dónde encontrarlas y qué tal funciona frente a iOS 26 en rendimiento y batería. Así sabréis qué os espera antes de actualizar. https://t.co/EtJTe41Tqh

    744105.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20266.1x their median

    Apple HomeView esconde una letra pequeña importante: para usar sus funciones avanzadas de IA necesitarás sí o sí un iPhone o iPad con Apple Intelligence activo. Sin un dispositivo compatible vinculado, las peticiones a Siri sobre tu contexto personal (como leer tus Mensajes, consultar el Calendario o las búsquedas avanzadas en grabaciones de vídeo) no funcionarán. En ese caso, el dispositivo se limitará a responder preguntas de cultura general, controlar el hogar y reproducir música.

    683116.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20265.7x their median

    Estas son las claves de privacidad del nuevo Apple HomeView: - Pantallas y widgets personalizados para hasta seis personas según su rostro. - Apps personales (como Mensajes o Calendario) bloqueadas si no estás cerca con tu iPhone desbloqueado. - Procesamiento en el dispositivo y nube privada para las peticiones a Siri. - Historiales de vídeo cifrados de extremo a extremo.

    635004.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20265.6x their median

    Apple acaba de presentar el nuevo Apple TV 4K con el chip A19, micrófonos de largo alcance para control por voz manos libres y la llegada de Siri AI impulsada por Apple Intelligence. https://t.co/MQXESPu0iv

    5328438K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.1x their median

    El HomeView nos gusta, pero seguimos sin verle sitio en casa. Y con el Apple TV a 349 €, cuesta justificar el cambio. En el podcast valoramos los anuncios de Apple y qué merece la pena comprar. https://t.co/n0exmhWbwV

    361003.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.383% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 290 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is La Manzana Mordida's engagement rate on X?
La Manzana Mordida (@LaMMordida) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 177,388 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, La Manzana Mordida sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,501 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LaMMordida have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LaMMordida post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going