Back to @LaGacetaTucuman's profile

La Gaceta de Tucumán engagement report

@LaGacetaTucuman - 233K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 233K followers
Per impression
0.091%
1.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 233K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.091% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.469% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

La Gaceta de Tucumán's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, La Gaceta de Tucumán sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 202617x their median

    Jaldo se refirió a la baja de la pobreza y pidió sostener la tendencia: “La flecha en Tucumán está para abajo” https://t.co/flVWETpQ3T

    93321.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.0x their median

    García Hamilton respaldó a Catalán y cuestionó el gasto público de Tucumán https://t.co/kjS2V4rq2y

    31211.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.0x their median

    Video: vecinos de Aguilares se metieron en un basural y desenterraron acolchados y ropa que Gendarmería había descartado https://t.co/oFFrCZzCDu

    31021.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.0x their median

    Sismo de 5,1 sacudió Tucumán, Salta y Catamarca: dónde fue el epicentro https://t.co/Ic9n887lJq

    42003.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20265.0x their median

    Tensión por las Malvinas: el Reino Unido advirtió que está preparado para defender las islas https://t.co/1HHIAF3E5A

    21202.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.0x their median

    Malvinas: el Gobierno prepara nuevas sanciones y definió que Quirno y Presti viajen a Tierra del Fuego https://t.co/D702N7COoC

    4100899 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.0x their median

    Lisandro Catalán cruzó a Jaldo por la ampliación presupuestaria: “Hipotecando el futuro de todos los tucumanos” https://t.co/HUiofpWP4j

    22001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.0x their median

    Manzur se reunió con Cristina Fernández de Kirchner y hablaron sobre Tucumán https://t.co/C1l6o8Pcvu

    21101.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.0x their median

    Murió Oscar “El Negro” González Oro: el día que el conductor se sinceró y habló de su sexualidad https://t.co/rtLYg73Pbg

    30102.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.0x their median

    Estación Aráoz: la tranquilidad de un pueblo, sacudida por los vínculos narcos https://t.co/g3rjzYybYt

    31001.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 233K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.091% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.469% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17 interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is La Gaceta de Tucumán's engagement rate on X?
La Gaceta de Tucumán (@LaGacetaTucuman) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 233,382 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, La Gaceta de Tucumán sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LaGacetaTucuman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LaGacetaTucuman post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going