Back to @LUOXIANGF's profile

罗翔 engagement report

@LUOXIANGF - 357K followers on X

Measured over 209 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 357K followers
Per impression
0.807%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
5.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
149
interactions (median)
Saved
0.081%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
20.9/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 209 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 209 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 209 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

罗翔's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, 罗翔 sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,711 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,711 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,082 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 377 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202613x their median

    2027新版人民币,这头像到底像谁? 第一眼:有点像。 第二眼:好像又不像。 第三眼:卧槽,怎么越看越不知道是谁? 这设计主打一个:熟悉的陌生人啊!🤣 https://t.co/fNvUoa6uYX

    1.6K85293131.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202613x their median

    💥突发:吉隆口岸700多名编制内人员失踪,家属小红书发声,被秒删...… 原帖:https://t.co/kJhCDtACCA https://t.co/0et3khhXvJ

    1.5K25323512365K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202613x their median

    💥炸裂,中秋节外卖纠纷酿成灭门惨案,骑手拍视频称“死而无憾”! 中秋节期间,一起外卖纠纷突然升级成惨剧。视频中,一名外卖骑手情绪激动地自述,自己拎着二三十斤的货物,走了两三百米送到货主小区楼下,但对方不仅不接电话,最后还表示不要了。 骑手在视频中反复强调:“打了六七个电话都不接,二三十斤的东西一直拎到他家小区楼底下。”随后情绪彻底失控,并称“直接给他灭门”,还声称现场已经有两人死亡,男主人躲在屋内,自己“本身就不想活了”“死而无憾”,并表示正在等待110到场。 从几十斤货物送不到,到情绪失控,再到酿成无法挽回的悲剧,真正令人后怕的,是一次普通纠纷竟然能够在极端情绪下迅速越过生命底线。无论双方此前发生了什么矛盾,都不应该成为伤害无辜生命的理由。 中秋本应是团圆的日子,却有人在这一天失去了家人。究竟是什么让一场送货纠纷最终走到了这一步?压死骆驼的最后一根稻草到底是什么?

    1.6K201155171.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20269.8x their median

    民主运动青年陈晓红在快手冲塔,直到冲塔完成又开始第二遍,快手直播间才反应过来,随后直播间被禁言关闭! 🔥楼主点评:这难道是快手故意放水,还是审核系统直接睡着了?第一遍冲塔没拦住,第二遍都开始了才反应过来,这审核速度多少有点“后知后觉”了!🤣 https://t.co/LIOmYd0ZqZ

    1.2K1349616194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20269.6x their median

    🔥留美学生投稿:潜伏美国的红色组织,竟然对留美学生“抓壮丁”,要求他们去欢迎皇上、对抗民运人士。学生不去,就遭到威胁:“停掉你的奖学金,回国后考公、进体制内单位就别想了,直接拉黑名单,甚至连家属也会受到影响。” 🔥楼主点评:这还不简单?学生直接拿着这条威胁信息去美国移民局申请政治庇护了!本来是自愿参加的欢迎活动,硬生生搞成了“不去就影响奖学金、不去就影响前途、不去还要连累家属”,这份“自愿”含金量属实有点高了!

    99727513125132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.7x their median

    💥网友投稿:2026/9/14/,广州番禺大学城,今天发生暴徒狂捅路人事件,目前已经至少7人受伤,暴徒残忍至极,用小刀专门捅女性女性的眼睛!暴徒目前已被抓获! 💥楼主点评: 冤有头,债有主!再大的怨气,也没有伤害无辜的理由。拿刀报复社会,伤害的往往是与你无冤无仇的人,最终也只会把自己送进深渊。希望警方尽快查清真相,依法严惩,给受伤者和公众一个交代。 💥那么,面对个人矛盾,怎样才能避免演变成伤害无辜的悲剧?

    99118210421281K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20268.6x their median

    🔥五年过去,王兴还是那个王兴。 有些人走得再远,初心始终不变;有些话,五年后再看,依然让人感慨。懂你的不易与执着! 为王兴点赞!👍 https://t.co/mfpyLCFwEU

    9619221516513K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.6x their median

    国防部内部人员投稿:突然签署《国防动员法》,一尊有可能将中国人民拖入战争的深渊! https://t.co/MSwVB3O8OB

    88517320512144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20268.4x their median

    🔥大条了,皇上今天在德里下飞机时滚楼梯跌了个狗啃屎!🤣 🔥楼主点评:这一下摔得属实有点猝不及防,皇上亲自上演“连滚带爬”这算不算另一种意义上的遥遥领先?建议以后下楼梯还是稳一点,毕竟全球镜头都盯着呢! 🔥问题来了:如果这都算“遥遥领先”,那到底领先在哪里? https://t.co/rmwdWnbJh4

    79550402101.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.3x their median

    贵州一男子店里漏煤气,打开店门后开灯瞬间,全身衣服都被炸飞了,人却没事!😂 https://t.co/rUAzITj58s

    912712526502K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 209 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.807% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 20.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 209 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is 罗翔's engagement rate on X?
罗翔 (@LUOXIANGF) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 209 original posts from the last 30 days against 357,269 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, 罗翔 sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,711 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LUOXIANGF have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LUOXIANGF post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 20.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going