Back to @LKrauss1's profile

Lawrence M. Krauss engagement report

@LKrauss1 - 455K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 455K followers
Per impression
0.66%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
2.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
68
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 68 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 61% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aliens, #seti, #lawrencekrauss.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #aliens, #seti, #lawrencekrauss.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lawrence M. Krauss's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Lawrence M. Krauss sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link61% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 61% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 1, 202616x their median

    Richard Feynman was amazing in so many ways. Was such an honor to both know him and write his scientific biography. https://t.co/weckZLcQNJ

    93113735633K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 20259.5x their median

    The War on Science can now be pre-ordered on Amazon and other book outlets. Pub date July 29th. Order it now! :) https://t.co/cELVwrTfoC

    3698018314160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20265.6x their median

    The Jason Arday debacle reflects problems with schools of education as much as it is an indictment of Cambridge. In my experience the scholarly standards at education schools can be second rate and what passes for research can be laughable. Not sure what purpose they serve at universities. Perhaps it is better to educate students in real fields at universities and then have separate one year vocational teacher training institutes that don’t have the pretense of being research institutes.

    3052541726K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.8x their median

    Starting a podcast soon with @LKrauss1 where we investigate and talk about phenomenal claims. Much of it will be in the spirit of James Randi, but with our own twist. We will delve into everything from telepathy to frontier science. Hint: He's Scully and I'm Mulder.

    2214274246K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.3x their median

    Bernie Sanders may be the worst thing that has happened to the Democrats. He helped get Donald Trump elected in 2016 & his support of leftist populists could blow what should (given a bumbling unpopular president & a do nothing congress) be a good chance of regaining power

    129978619K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20263.2x their median

    So awe inspiring to speak at a theatre with 2500 years of history. Just thinking about all the amazing events that have happened here. https://t.co/IRD4rI0NOO

    200711111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20263.0x their median

    Ok. I am going to wade in. I saw The Odyssey in Cyprus on the say it opened. It was ok. My issue was the casting. Nothing to do with gender or race. I just found every character, with the exception of Charlize Theron, to be horrifically mis-cast. Unknowns would have been better.

    154148227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.0x their median

    Using quotas based on identity politics for Canada Research Chairs. rather than hiring based on excellence is hurting Canadian science, as this study demonstrates. Shameful. https://t.co/6ChmN2NVMy

    166249211K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.5x their median

    Second trip up the west coast 1k miles without touching steering wheel. @elonmusk the only thing that would improve things is if I could say “engage!” and self driving would take over! Am I missing something?

    148517019K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.4x their median

    To the American Airlines pilot John who got me safely to flagstaff through some pretty harsh conditions and then wanted a selfie with me. Thanks! You made my day in many ways. https://t.co/hlRKq9NY5n

    15637011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aliens#seti#lawrencekrauss#science#johngertz

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 68 interactions against 455K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 61% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aliens, #seti, #lawrencekrauss.

What is Lawrence M. Krauss's engagement rate on X?
Lawrence M. Krauss (@LKrauss1) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 454,753 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Lawrence M. Krauss sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LKrauss1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LKrauss1 post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going