Back to @LFCTransferRoom's profile

LFC Transfer Room engagement report

@LFCTransferRoom - 445K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.062%
of 445K followers
Per impression
0.975%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
6.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
277
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 277 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LFC Transfer Room's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, LFC Transfer Room sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202658x their median

    🚨 𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧: If the sub-boards from the referees weren't broken, Liverpool would have been able to bring on their subs and the penalty moment would have never happened. But the board was broken and so the play continued. https://t.co/hE3Xu12WJP

    15K8101241411.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202612x their median

    Another great cameo from Nyoni. Deserves to start https://t.co/uqO3s1zvbu

    3.2K6739440K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.6x their median

    Virgil van Dijk: “It shouldn't have been a penalty.” https://t.co/BdB62B33RQ

    1.8K515134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.6x their median

    Alexis Mac Allister on coming from behind twice: “Yeah, it’s good. I actually spoke with one of the guys in the coaching staff last week about our mentality when we are losing, which is something very very positive. But as I said before, it’s not enough. We are at Liverpool. There’s not transition years. You have to win and that’s what we want.” (via @StanSportFC)

    1.5K512460K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.9x their median

    Andoni Iraola on the sub getting delayed: “A profressional fourth official cannot take three minutes for the subs. I was very angry because in the previous stop we couldn’t make it. Before the throw in we said let’s do it now but, I don’t know how to explain it but it took ages.”

    1.0K545258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.6x their median

    ℹ️ 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 - @JacobsBen via @LastWordOnSpurs: Cody Gakpo was not expecting this Man City interest 2-3 weeks ago. If Manchester City choose not to go for Iliman Ndiaye, they will go ALL IN on Cody Gakpo late in the window. https://t.co/Gu1lF3sLjX

    67830169177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    ℹ️ 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 - @FabrizioRomano: “Tomorrow Bradley Barcola will be ready for the first part of medical tests at Liverpool. Contract signing and everything completed, everything agreed, everything signed, the documents are done. So it was never in doubt.” “Very soon Liverpool fans will have the opportunity to see the player finally in a red shirt.”

    634213025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.9x their median

    Steven Gerrard says Liverpool lack a little bit of ‘nastiness’. https://t.co/Cy4Do022uD

    488196627K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.8x their median

    Andoni Iraola on whether Cody Gakpo is a regular option for the right wing: “With the wingers, obviously normally they have a preferred position, but we normally analyse the match-ups, analyse what they have do on one side, what they need to do on the other side.” “We decided with Rio [Ngumoha] and Victor to change them at the end. I think they have get used [to that]. I think he [Gakpo] was going to be one of the subs when we scored the goal, he made a great play and then we were creating momentum.” “I decided to leave them a little bit more - three, four minutes - to see if we could use this momentum to score a second one. When it went a little bit more plain, we decided to do those subs. That goal and the other one were, I think, very good goals.”

    482151140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.6x their median

    🇳🇱🇸🇳 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 - @FabrizioRomano: Liverpool will only sell Gakpo if they get a top replacement, Minteh is quiet but Sarr is still being mentioned internally at Liverpool. If a new name emerges, I will let you know. https://t.co/6PehQrYxKd

    36612421630K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 277 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is LFC Transfer Room's engagement rate on X?
LFC Transfer Room (@LFCTransferRoom) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 444,630 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, LFC Transfer Room sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LFCTransferRoom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LFCTransferRoom post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going