Back to @LFCTransferRoom's profile

LFC Transfer Room engagement report

@LFCTransferRoom - 447K followers on X

Measured over 105 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 447K followers
Per impression
0.709%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
5.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
182
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.97/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 105 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.709% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 105 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfcu21s, #ucl, #lfcu18s.

Measured over 105 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #lfcu21s, #ucl, #lfcu18s.

Compared with accounts its own size

LFC Transfer Room's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, LFC Transfer Room sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link32% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 32% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202688x their median

    🚨 𝗖π—₯𝗔𝗭𝗬 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧: If the sub-boards from the referees weren't broken, Liverpool would have been able to bring on their subs and the penalty moment would have never happened. But the board was broken and so the play continued. https://t.co/hE3Xu12WJP

    15K8101241411.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202625x their median

    Some win. https://t.co/lnOPe4NpcQ

    4.5K517284K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202624x their median

    BREAKING: Manchester City open talks with Liverpool to sign winger Cody Gakpo πŸš¨πŸ‡³πŸ‡± https://t.co/aOfbU2cxrK

    4.1K2205320419K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202621x their median

    πŸ”΄πŸ“Š Liverpool FC has been ranked as the most culturally relevant football club among Europe's leading clubs according to insights from independent global research, reinforcing the club's influence both on and off the pitch. https://t.co/1Y2jjajhQt

    3.5K341161180K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202618x their median

    Another great cameo from Nyoni. Deserves to start https://t.co/uqO3s1zvbu

    3.2K6739440K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202613x their median

    πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΎπŸ‘πŸ» Liverpool are delighted with Ronald Araujo and very satisfied with the performances of the Uruguayan at the beginning of the campaign. If it continues like this, a purchase attempt at the end of the season would not be unreasonable, reports @sport. https://t.co/ogI88lIwVW

    2.3K57177187K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202612x their median

    The boss is back. The world heals. https://t.co/U6eGFbPeaN

    2.1K844430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202612x their median

    A very special talent πŸ‘€ https://t.co/3wVBqG355J

    2.1K423245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202610x their median

    Virgil van Dijk: β€œIt shouldn't have been a penalty.” https://t.co/BdB62B33RQ

    1.8K515134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20269.2x their median

    Incredible drama! goals in the 94th and 96th minute earn 10-men Liverpool a draw. #LFCU21s We now head to penalties in the Jersey Mike's Trophy to see who'll gain the extra point. https://t.co/8LrahRrr6n

    1.6K61101172K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lfcu21s#ucl#lfcu18s

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 182 interactions against 447K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 105 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.709% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 105 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 32% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 88x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfcu21s, #ucl, #lfcu18s.

What is LFC Transfer Room's engagement rate on X?
LFC Transfer Room (@LFCTransferRoom) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 105 original posts from the last 30 days against 446,929 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, LFC Transfer Room sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LFCTransferRoom have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LFCTransferRoom post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going