Back to @LCSOfficial's profile

LCS engagement report

@LCSOfficial - 265K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 265K followers
Per impression
1.14%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
100
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 265K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lcs, #tlawwin, #c9win.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #lcs, #tlawwin, #c9win.

Compared with accounts its own size

LCS's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, LCS sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 102 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202620x their median

    Congratulations to today's #LCS Player of the Series: #TLAWWIN Josedeodo! https://t.co/mSLRqNcTT1

    2.0K7511423K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202617x their median

    Dom is best coach ever Cause If I wanna drink Starbucks even he’s watching LCS at home And I call him he always comes instantly and buys coffee for me Ty @IWDominate

    1.7K165285K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 202616x their median

    Sup guys, it’s been a minute but just wanted to make a tweet so I can hold myself accountable for my goal this/next year. TLDR at bottom I’m setting the goal to try to be on the big stage again. I figured instead of slowly disappearing, something like this would be better for me. I’ve been thinking alot the past few months and dealing with that cringe quarter life crisis thing figuring out myself in my free time. I’d say I want to play league with intentional effort and stop trying to live life on autopilot again. I did intentionally skip out on NACL Spring opportunities to have time for myself and deal with a family concern, but I will be looking for any future opportunities. I will admit I could have tried harder many points in my career, at the same time I heavily limited myself with many negative/harsh and unrealistic (perfectionist) mindsets. As a result I measured effort purely with intensity and results, but I want consistency to be a way bigger factor this time around. I also did try to stream to connect with fans before but I always got too in my head about my image, but I’ll try to push through that. So come watch me on https://t.co/pxjDj2Geb2 as I’ll try to be more active If I dont get anymore LCS opportunities in 2027, I’ll likely move on, but I’ll be getting back on the grind (sorry i if int your games in the near future). I’ll spare some details so it’s not a whole book series but ultimately I’m trying to be more intentional with a routine. TLDR Using this tweet to help hold me accountable to grind for routine and big stage again, Cheers

    1.5K49417387K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202615x their median

    WELCOME TO GEORGIA. WELCOME TO WORLDS. #C9WIN / #LCS https://t.co/XVLl7dDGiM

    1.4K811444103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202615x their median

    "Do you want to send us off to a break?" "...No..." https://t.co/4fCcD4UGN1

    1.4K2844130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202615x their median

    👁️👁️ https://t.co/yhFR9MApIj

    1.4K2837223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.0x their median

    Three goats on stage 🐐🐐🐐 Shoutout to @Damonte, @ApolloPrice, and @BasiilLeaf. https://t.co/urc3O02sAJ

    862141112226K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20268.4x their median

    SAINT LOL https://t.co/0bMkmcgb48

    821153345K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20267.8x their median

    9th time is the charm 🙏 @C9LoL is going to #Worlds2026! https://t.co/v8O8ybrkrA

    762148124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20267.5x their median

    Sharing a moment with @blaber and @JackEtienne 🥹 https://t.co/f8yRt4SV3A

    6874611841K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lcs#tlawwin#c9win#lyonwin#flywin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 265K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lcs, #tlawwin, #c9win.

What is LCS's engagement rate on X?
LCS (@LCSOfficial) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 264,751 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, LCS sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LCSOfficial have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LCSOfficial post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going