Back to @LCP's profile

LCP engagement report

@LCP - 668K followers on X

Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 668K followers
Per impression
0.22%
5.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.77/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 668K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 0.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.887% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canal8, #icileurope.

Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #canal8, #icileurope.

Compared with accounts its own size

LCP's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, LCP sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link59% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202680x their median

    "Vous niez l’oppression que subissent les femmes": la proposition de Thomas Ménagé (RN) de décompter les hommes tués suscite des critiques de plusieurs députées, qui y voient un retour en arrière sur la notion de "féminicide" https://t.co/Fj9OsedOfa

    676108105153322K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202647x their median

    "Celui qui n’est plus là et qui guide chaque jour ma vie": l’émotion poignante de la députée Émilie Bonnivard (DR), qui fond en larmes en dédiant "ses mots, son engagement" à ses "petits neveux adorés" et à Olivier Marleix, disparu en juillet 2025 https://t.co/HWuBNYcxhx

    514857262K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202638x their median

    Une descendante du général de Gaulle figure sur la liste du RN aux sénatoriales dans la Sarthe https://t.co/sSMMBtaQ3j

    3588643818K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202635x their median

    “Il m’a mis un couteau sous la gorge, m’a conduite en plein jour dans un sous-bois et m’a v*olée": émue aux larmes, @Clem_Autain revient sur l’agression qu’elle a subie https://t.co/zch0dTZB2o

    32510420730K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202625x their median

    Présidentielle 2027: Gabriel Attal "persuadé que le rassemblement se fera derrière" sa candidature https://t.co/dVdgbNBRar

    109301603020K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202625x their median

    ""Les ministres ne paient pas leur essence (...) même pour les déplacements privés (...) Ils ne se rendent pas compte": selon @RoyalSegolene, les politiques doivent être "exemplaires", car ils sont élus pour "être au service du pays" https://t.co/hGO1RmC06E

    186496923179K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202622x their median

    "Vous avez tout raté, vous avez tout ruiné. Si votre politique avait fonctionné, les caisses seraient pleines": @JphTanguy impute au gouvernement la responsabilité du déficit public https://t.co/TLTptsU0Su

    1975632414K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202618x their median

    Comment Éric Gérard (Liot) a appris en septembre qu’il était député à son insu… depuis le mois de juillet. Il raconte son histoire. https://t.co/xBMldXgKuB

    18131101134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202613x their median

    "Nos démocraties traversent une crise de confiance profonde", témoigne @YaelBRAUNPIVET. Face à ce "désenchantement", elle appelle à "réduire la fracture" entre les institutions et le peuple et à "créer un véritable continuum entre démocratie représentative et participative". https://t.co/jIxjdgGYwg

    1761302018K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202612x their median

    "Avec le macronisme, on a subi des décisions autoritaires, inexpliquées": @RoyalSegolene observe que "le pouvoir rend fou", alors qu’un citoyen est, selon elle, "l’égal" du président de la République https://t.co/DXEzXd31Aw

    1043013831K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#canal8#icileurope

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 668K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.9K times each, and 0.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.887% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canal8, #icileurope.

What is LCP's engagement rate on X?
LCP (@LCP) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 108 original posts from the last 30 days against 667,803 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, LCP sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LCP have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LCP post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going