Back to @LBC's profile

LBC engagement report

@LBC - 751K followers on X

Measured over 123 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 751K followers
Per impression
0.263%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
1.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
33
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.23/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 751K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 123 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 123 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 362x its own typical post.

Measured over 123 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LBC's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, LBC sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 161 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 2026362x their median

    'I handle a £100 million budget for a London council, but I can't get a job at McDonald's.' Deputy Mayor of Hackney Dylan Law explains how tough the job market is for young workers, and he thinks he's living proof. https://t.co/DtEvQyXaca

    9.9K1.0K8052815.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202649x their median

    'They're not a professional political party... it's mafia-esque.' @RobbieLammas explains why representing Reform UK as a councillor was 'the biggest mistake of his life'. https://t.co/UYqxI0pI0e

    1.1K4361042973K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202640x their median

    'At every step, it was the US trying to co-opt Canada into becoming America's 51st state.' Simon Marks breaks down the way that PM Mark Carney 'has schooled every world leader in how to stand up to Donald Trump'. https://t.co/p8TWtFg0C1

    977237821336K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202636x their median

    'That speech gave me hope!' Labour has won over Reform supporter Will after Andy Burnham's party conference speech. https://t.co/DvfgQbxyXe

    8137727015118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202634x their median

    “We’ve become frightened of saying our own culture matters too." On integration, @policylaila believes we’ve become too ‘nervous’ when Islam enters the conversation. https://t.co/Qm83VPMHG8

    7991281931644K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202628x their median

    'A population held captive by the self-interest of the wealthiest generation in history.’ @TomSwarbrick1 can’t help but grin after Burnham vowed to scrap pensions triple lock. https://t.co/I9KohwEA0Z

    77590361042K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202624x their median

    ‘I remember seeing Tony Blair speak, Andy Burnham might be better.’ Andrew Marr was blown away by the Prime Minister’s Labour Party Conference speech. https://t.co/UOSTrwdflk

    554901501425K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202623x their median

    'That was the most consequential speech I've ever seen.' Andy Burnham's address to the Labour Party Conference has left quite an impression on @IainDale. https://t.co/HwawMaX7Ql

    57766115487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202620x their median

    'They're not the Labour Party anymore - they are the Welfare Party.' 'Defence of the country is more important than paying benefits.' @KemiBadenoch roundly rejects Andy Burnham's reluctance to raise defence spending. https://t.co/QoNgFWdeYq

    412691821328K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202616x their median

    Burnham's speech was delivered by a leader who believes in himself - and more importantly, the rest of us too, writes Andrew Marr https://t.co/Pr2Oa0cnJT

    322521401117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 33 interactions against 751K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 123 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.263% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 123 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 362x its own typical post.

What is LBC's engagement rate on X?
LBC (@LBC) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 123 original posts from the last 30 days against 751,480 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, LBC sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LBC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LBC post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going