Back to @LASHYBILLS's profile

LASHY BILLS engagement report

@LASHYBILLS - 503K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 503K followers
Per impression
1.20%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
3.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
234
interactions (median)
Saved
0.231%
45 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 234 interactions against 503K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

LASHY BILLS's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, LASHY BILLS sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202654x their median

    Spending $575 to eat like a poor person is diabolical😭 https://t.co/z8fAdA9IQ3

    12K525295143346K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202633x their median

    RODWAVE STOP PLAYING VICTIM. THAT WAS YOUR 4r 5 TH TIME DOING WHAT YOU DID TO MY RECORDS. NOW U SAYING U WAS SHOWING LOVE N WHAT U LOOKED UP TO WASNT REAL . U WOULDNT HAVE NEVER DID THAT TO ANOTHER ARTIST BUT U DID THAT TO ME CAUSE YOU KNOW IM A REAL NIGGA .N SHOWING LOVE WOULDA BEEN POPPING ME OFF WHEN I ASK U TOO.SHOWING LOVE WOULDA BEEN POPPING ME OFF THIS ONE TIME FOR ALL THE TIMES U DID IT BEFORE.SHOWING LOVE WOULDA BEEN REACHING OUT TO WORK WITH ME AFTER U DID THIS THIS THE FIRST COUPLE TIMES . SHOWING LOVE WOULDA BEEN POPPING ME OFF WHEN U FOUND OUT I DIDNT OWN THE SONG JUST SOME CRUMBS OF THE PUBLISHING. IF I WOULDA DID THAT MULTIPLE TIMES N I LOOKED UP TO A ARTIST N MY SACK WAS STRAIGHT I WOULDA BLESSED HIM. THATS WHAT REAL NIGGAS DO ‼️NO U RATHER GIVE IT TO THEM JEWS N GIVE ME NOTHING ‼️N I STILL AINT SUE YOU NIGGA ‼️STOP PLAYING VICTIM N LETS IT GO .I LET IT GO U SHOULD DO THE SAME .

    6.3K548566425822K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202618x their median

    Dude should’ve chin check her ass the moment she spit on him https://t.co/nUwA33y3Lj

    3.7K2541502093K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202610x their median

    This man converted a stud back into a woman😭 https://t.co/ZPoMhurO5s

    2.2K1034911145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.0x their median

    I would have pumped $5 then pumped another $5 transaction after transaction until I get to $100🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/X6YL7oX0Lu

    1.7K892651471K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.0x their median

    Prime example why you shouldn't pop pills https://t.co/s1dbDxTVlS

    1.1K6422651K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.3x their median

    A tourist was assaulting a young Thai woman who asked for help. The foreigner had been trying to force her into an unlicensed nightclub at 2 p.m. after a full night of drinking. The man filming had already been assaulted off-camera, so he began recording the interaction. After being threatened, he removed his shirt and was assaulted again while protecting his phone. The drunk tourist then assaulted a second woman who was trying to de-escalate the situation. Bystanders stepped in to remove the young Thai woman from the scene while a group of Thai men distracted the tourist. Later, the same man was assaulted one final time while ordering a drink at an after-hours bar. The tourist snuck up from behind him, prompting him to leave without his beer. When he returned the next day, he discovered he had been banned from his favorite bar in the world. He never posted the video at the time because the investigation might have led police to raid the unlicensed club a few hours later. Despite receiving multiple threats, he chose not to play the victim. He stayed calm and waited for events to unfold. His integrity was not for sale. He loves Thailand and he loves Pattayayet his favorite bar no longer wants him there. The unedited video shows the tourist was clearly on far more than alcohol. The man filming did the right thing when no one else was watching. He made a deliberate effort not to take the confrontation to the ground. He had no intention of fighting; every strike he delivered was solely to create distance and reduce the number of times he could be hit.

    7362516182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.5x their median

    A five-month-pregnant stripper refuses to let her pregnancy stop her from dancing. https://t.co/3P5tJJDeXN

    4982547529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    A woman called her older brothers to deal with a swimming instructor who touched her 10-year-old sister and followed her into the bathroom https://t.co/CuN6Xlorvh

    5352415130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.3x their median

    "My wife put me lunch and yo wife no put you lunch "😭🤣🤣 https://t.co/uEq3d4TRLj

    4534927824K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 234 interactions against 503K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 54x its own typical post.

What is LASHY BILLS's engagement rate on X?
LASHY BILLS (@LASHYBILLS) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 502,654 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, LASHY BILLS sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LASHYBILLS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LASHYBILLS post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going