Back to @L2Coop_'s profile

L2 Coop engagement report

@L2Coop_ - 120K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 120K followers
Per impression
0.617%
7.6K views on a typical post
Reach
6.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
47
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.617% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 322 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

L2 Coop's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, L2 Coop sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 236 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 20266.9x their median

    The Denzel boston coming out party. Lock this in. This line is a fucking joke. 🪜 35.5 1U 🪜 50+ .5U 🪜 60+ .2U 🪜 70+ .1U Boston is my favorite rec yards prop to ladder because he is being utilized as Cleveland's premier downfield perimeter weapon, generating a team-leading 4.00 Yards Per Route Run, an explosive 21.0 Average Depth of Target , and 21.1 Yards Per Target, meaning his downfield usage allows him to clear typical receiving yardage lines on just 2 or 3 catches. This aligns directly with Pittsburgh’s defensive vulnerabilities, as the Steelers surrender 74.3 receiving yards per game to opposing WR1s (12th most in the NFL) and give up massive explosive plays (allowing a 63.0-yard long reception average to primary wideouts). Furthermore, Boston runs 81% of his routes on the outside where he holds a favorable matchup advantage against Steelers CB Jamel Dean (who allows 9.53 Yards Per Target on coverage snaps), and because Pittsburgh runs Zone coverage on 88.5% of dropbacks (primarily Cover 3 and Cover 4 shells), Boston's downfield sideline routes are built to hit soft spots in their deep zone leverage.

    3001066204K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20264.8x their median

    Happy Tee Higgins days to those who celebrate. 70+🪜 80+ 🪜 90+ 🪜 100+ 🪜 Tee Higgins is my favorite rec yards prop to ladder because he is being utilized as Cincinnati's premier downfield perimeter weapon, generating a team-leading 3.50 Yards Per Route Run, a 31% Target Per Route Run rate, and an explosive 17.4 Yards Per Reception average through three games (244 yards on 14 catches), meaning his downfield usage allows him to clear typical receiving yardage lines on just 3 or 4 catches. Coming off back-to-back explosive outings of 95 yards against Houston and 90 yards against Pittsburgh, his usage aligns directly with defensive vulnerabilities in the Jacksonville Jaguars' secondary, as Jacksonville surrenders 142.5 receiving yards per game to perimeter wideouts and gives up frequent explosive downfield gains. Furthermore, because Jacksonville runs single-coverage Cover 1 and soft Cover 3 zone shells on the boundary to account for Ja'Marr Chase, Higgins' high ADOT and 1-on-1 matchup advantage on sideline routes make him the ultimate candidate to ladder all the way up to alternate lines today.

    2061092103K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.9x their median

    OMG BANGG Tonight just keeps getting better. cord is CASHING TN!!!! https://t.co/4phEqyW1gd

    12616130K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.8x their median

    I really appreciate anyone supporting me lately! I’m gonna continue to keep posting my favorite ladders for yall. Let’s cash big tn!!

    1202716.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20262.5x their median

    We just hit in absolute BANGER. We've been crushing it lately and i want everyone to win too! lets keep killing it. Click this link or use code "COOP" for 80% off ($3) your first month. it doesnt get much better then this @DubClub_win 268-1✅ https://t.co/JY9fv0aWET https://t.co/lpz3DUUIcY

    904222127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.1x their median

    Everyone in the world is on Kyle Pitts ladder 😂

    78119034K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20261.5x their median

    Happy drake london night to those who celebrate. Drake London is the undisputed #1 receiving yards prop on tonight's board for me. The New Orleans Saints run Zone coverage on 90.7% of dropbacks (ranking #3 highest in the NFL), dominated by Cover 3 (60.7%). London completely shreds Zone coverage, posting an elite 3.68 Yards Per Route Run (YPRR) and 13.6 Yards Per Target against Zone shells. Furthermore, the Saints' defense is a total funnel against perimeter wideouts—they rank #27 in wide targets allowed (45), #25 in wide receptions allowed (30), and yield 121.0 receiving yards per game to wide alignments. With London lining up wide 67% of the time and holding a dominant team-high target share against both coverage schemes, he has the highest floor and ceiling on the entire slate. 80+ 🪜 90+ 🪜 100+ 🪜 110+ 🪜

    6225215K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    HEAT CHECK. Night game ladder. This is a very sneaky line. Lions ranked dead last vs Inline TEs allowing 17 catches and 207 yards. Mitchell Evans plays the most inline but him barely playing scares me off so I’m taking tremble. Tremble plays 53% of snaps in the inline, Waller only plays 22%. I do believe Waller has a good game but I’m riding with these low lines.

    6413218K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Tomorrow’s ladder play drops tonight. Turn those notis on, we sweeping again🧹🧹🧹🧹

    660205.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Let’s heat check. 🪜 Who’s with me? https://t.co/iXEa44MElx

    4724014K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 120K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.6K times each, and 0.617% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 322 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is L2 Coop's engagement rate on X?
L2 Coop (@L2Coop_) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 120,146 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, L2 Coop sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @L2Coop_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @L2Coop_ post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going