Kyle Chassé 🐸 engagement report
@Kylechasse - 287K followers on X
Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 287K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.
Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kyle Chassé 🐸's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.02%, Kyle Chassé 🐸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 74% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 366 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 202652x their median
Why does Warren hate crypto this much? https://t.co/nigAACi0yS
- Jul 4, 202544x their median
🚨 THE 99% DESERVE EARLY ACCESS “You can blow your savings in Vegas… but you can’t invest early in AI, robotics, or nuclear? Absurd.” We’re pushing to tokenize private markets so everyday Americans can invest before valuations hit billions. https://t.co/V0tbEuUzwQ
- Sep 15, 202621x their median
🗳️ CLARITY just failed cloture, [YEA–NAY]. Here's what that actually means, because most of the replies are about to get it wrong. The bill isn't dead. A failed cloture vote leaves it on the calendar, and Thune can move to reconsider and re-run it the day 60 votes exist. GENIUS did exactly this last year: failed cloture 48-49 on May 8, passed 66-32 on May 19, signed in July. Eleven days. What's dead is the calendar. The Senate leaves town October 1, so about eleven working days, most of them eaten by the September 30 funding deadline. The House already took the rest of September off and isn't back until after the election. And Republicans rejected the Democrats' counteroffer this morning, so unlike GENIUS there's no deal sitting in the drawer to redo the vote on. That leaves two windows. A second try before Oct 1 if somebody blinks on ethics this week. Or the lame duck in November/December, where it needs cloture again, final passage, the House, and a signature before January 3. Miss that and it restarts from zero in 2027 with a House that's probably Democratic. Bitcoin priced all of this a week ago. The odds of the bill becoming law went 13% → 34% → 13% and BTC never left its box. Fed at 2pm tomorrow ⏳ That's the one this market has been waiting on all week.
- Sep 19, 202620x their median
A little birdie told me that something is cooking on $SUI and no one is ready for it yet... Something fast. Get ready. https://t.co/yz2EPnxhx0
- Sep 4, 202617x their median
He puts a number on Bitcoin's bottom. @benjamincowen breaks down the pattern: a February low, a countertrend rally, a summer low, then the real test in Q4. His odds: 65% the low is still ahead. 35% it’s already behind us. Check out the framework he’s using to navigate the rest of the year. 👇
- Sep 16, 202615x their median
https://t.co/QsUn3yXSiP
- Sep 19, 202613x their median
Is this proof that crypto is fine without the CLARITY Act? Over $220B added to crypto since then. https://t.co/nrzwgwPRsW
- Sep 15, 202611x their median
No matter what happens today, crypto pumped before the CLARITY Act and it can pump without it.
- Sep 1, 20269.8x their median
SUI is one of the few chains building for agents. And they keep getting better at it. Agents are coming whether you like it or not, but very few names are actually making it possible. Those names will end up at the top. Eyes open. https://t.co/ZFFKOD9v7r
- Sep 4, 20268.4x their median
SUI is smashing it. futures are one of those things that sound complicated until someone actually explains how they work. Now, Sui is teaming up with @CMEGroup for a live teach-in on futures fundamentals No jargon. no gatekeeping. Just a practical breakdown of how futures and exchange-traded derivatives actually work worth tuning in 👀
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 287K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.
- What is Kyle Chassé 🐸's engagement rate on X?
- Kyle Chassé 🐸 (@Kylechasse) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 286,887 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.02%, Kyle Chassé 🐸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Kylechasse have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Kylechasse post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.17 posts per day across the measured window.