Back to @Kwebbelkop's profile

Kwebbelkop engagement report

@Kwebbelkop - 357K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 357K followers
Per impression
0.146%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.63%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.146% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 4941x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kwebbelkop's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Kwebbelkop sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 456 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20264941x their median

    YouTube's system for shadow banning low-quality AI content has mistakenly targeted creator Kurzgesagt It flagged their human-made animation as "AI slop," resulting in the channel's worst-performing upload since 2013 https://t.co/RGChhzjx99

    38K1.1K3833493.1M viewsView on X
  • Feb 21, 2026632x their median

    Sarah Bond, president of Xbox, has resigned. https://t.co/1UxA8oNJEM

    14K4614395899.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261298x their median

    I asked Rockstar Games' Rob Nelson how GTA 6's driving compares to GTA 4/5. Me: Would you say the driving is as weighty as GTAIV? Rob Nelson: Only in the best way possible. The team has worked hard to maintain the some of the best parts of the weightiness and feel of GTAIV, but have the accessibility of GTAV. It has all been built up from scratch on this hardware and they have much more control tuning drivetrain, tires, suspension, steering, all of that is getting applied to the physics model.

    9.9K33215815608K viewsView on X
  • Feb 5, 2026310x their median

    Thoughts? https://t.co/4M22smb61e

    3.2K973.9K213943K viewsView on X
  • Feb 12, 2026215x their median

    The Dutch Republic had the world's highest GDP per capita for 150 years Built Europe's economic engine through systems and competence Now Dutchmen rage when Jutta Leerdam, Olympic gold medalist, flies private Success built the Netherlands Resentment defines it today When did socialists convince us that excellence deserves punishment?

    4.6K28819035561K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026431x their median

    YouTube AI detection system mistakenly flagged popular creator Kurzgesagt and its human-made animations as 'AI Slop' https://t.co/cU03PTyvLq

    3.2K1057732198K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 202646x their median

    MrBeast reveals his plans to slowly phase out of being in every video over time “Normal companies it’s like the CEO at the top and it’s like a pyramid but for this kind of company it’s almost inverted cause I am the product and it’s like everyone depends on me and if I don’t show up and film we don’t upload” “I think the easiest forte is like America’s Got Talent or Shark Tank or whatever I’m one of the hosts for a few first few seasons and then I drive my audience they get it you see the format’s really good and then I could phase out over time and they keep watching cause it’s a very high quality great show” “I could be there for 70% of the video maybe not 100% and ideally we’re making 20 30 40 hit shows a year we have dozens of YouTube channels but I can’t be in all of them nor do I want to that would be way too much work”

    1.1K143312424K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026107x their median

    N3on almost LOST 50K Kick followers in just ONE hour after introducing his first-ever AI stream 😭 https://t.co/SW88q3SagT

    780545261.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 202674x their median

    F in the chat. RIP Kwebbelkop ai https://t.co/TnwuTdyv1B

    5451629260K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 202649x their median

    Glad to be back on YouTube after a 5 year break. Let’s speedrun this to 100M subs. Looking to hire a killer creative director / channel manager.

    322859591K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.146% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 4941x its own typical post.

What is Kwebbelkop's engagement rate on X?
Kwebbelkop (@Kwebbelkop) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 356,518 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Kwebbelkop sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Kwebbelkop have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Kwebbelkop post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going