Back to @KristenKindle's profile

Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ engagement report

@KristenKindle - 307K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 307K followers
Per impression
0.139%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
8.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pawg, #bigass, #mommy.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #pawg, #bigass, #mommy.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 20263.2x their median

    Can this #bigass get a like? ā¤ļø I’m available now for calls but only if you like #pawg #slut šŸ‘šŸ˜šŸ’¦ https://t.co/PgG1MkrW7S

    11462020K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.6x their median

    Like this post if you wish you could clap these cheeks! šŸ‘šŸ† CALLS ON! FETISHES WELCOME! #pawg #cuck #bbc https://t.co/AnPrnw9qLn

    9622019K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.1x their median

    Cum #worship this big #booty today! I’m naked and ready for your call šŸ˜ #pawg https://t.co/dMCAfl79uL

    7811017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.9x their median

    Hit like if you want to rip them open and fuck me like a good #slut šŸ’¦ CALLS ON #bbc #pawg https://t.co/C8ABvyzkAr

    7130025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.6x their median

    Hit like if you love my soft #allnatural cheeks šŸ‘ CALLS ON šŸ“² #pawg #joi https://t.co/G3RMVGnFol

    5740028K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.6x their median

    Hit like if I’m built for #bbc CALLS ON šŸ“² #pawg #cuck https://t.co/YlHz4Tfvze

    5621022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.5x their median

    Hit like if you can handle this #bigass šŸ‘šŸ˜ #pawg #videocall https://t.co/WaK59IrxbS

    5710013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    Hit like if my #booty looks good in this string bikini! šŸ˜ CALLS ON! šŸ™Œ #pawg #bigass https://t.co/7PlG0JEgDf

    5320037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 2026

    #allnatural booty waves šŸ‘šŸŒŠ Like this post if you ā¤ļø seeing me get fucked my #bbc CALLS ON! šŸ“² #pawg https://t.co/gTBnZgL2wW

    5032020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Hit like if you want #mommy to twerk on your cock just like this 😈 CALLS ON! #pawg #bigass https://t.co/mmrciC7LGO

    5220029K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#pawg#bigass#mommy#allnatural#assworship

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 307K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 122 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pawg, #bigass, #mommy.

What is Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ's engagement rate on X?
Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ (@KristenKindle) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 306,886 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Kristen Kindle šŸ‘šŸ¤Æ sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KristenKindle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KristenKindle post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going