Back to @KongEzza805's profile

默默Kong(满血版) engagement report

@KongEzza805 - 281K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 281K followers
Per impression
0.228%
3.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 281K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.5K times each, and 0.228% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51 interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

默默Kong(满血版)'s engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, 默默Kong(满血版) sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link95% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 330 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20266.4x their median

    从图表来看, $CHUMP 在经历前期持续上涨后,市场热度 度明显升温,价格快速拉升并伴随着较强的成交活跃度。随后高位出现多次剧烈震荡,买卖双方博弈明显加剧,短线资金不断进出,市场情绪也从快速拉升逐渐转向高位整理。@ChumpCoinX https://t.co/02XQXMI0LS 目前来看, CHUMP 在经历 轮调整后,价格逐步进入相对稳定的震荡区间。虽然上方仍存在 定抛压,但低位承接依然存在,走势并没有出现明显失控的迹象。近期K线逐渐收敛,市场正在寻找新的方向。 如果后续买方力量重新增强,并成功突破前期压力区域, CHUMP 可能迎来新 轮上涨动能;反之,如果承接力度减弱,也需要留意高位震荡后的进 步回调。 整体而言, CHUMP 当前更像是在经历 轮上涨后的筹码重新整理。市场关注度仍然较高,后续能否重新放量并突破关键位置,将成为判断下 阶段走势的重要信号。

    3012905.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.1x their median

    从目前的短周期走势来看, $TURBO 在经历前期快速拉升和回调之后,整体价格结构正在逐步修复。 前期冲高后虽然出现明显回落,但随后价格并没有继续走弱,而是在相对低位持续整理,并不断出现反弹。近期可以看到价格重心再次向上移动,买盘的承接也开始变得更加积极。 目前市场仍处于较高波动阶段,短线多空博弈比较明显。经历连续上涨之后,出现震荡消化属于正常现象,关键还是看后续能否保持当前的上升结构。 如果调整过程中买盘持续跟进,并成功突破前方压力区域,TURBO 的市场情绪或许会进 步升温。相比短线追涨,更值得关注的是回调后的承接力度以及整体趋势是否能够延续。 0x808a9D5071E7d5f58490cB7385027536BbE43eF0

    17121029.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.9x their median

    $QENIS 的盘面经历了 轮明显拉升后,目前进入回撤整理阶段。此前价格在低位逐步抬升,并在中途多次出现资金活跃的迹象,随后快速突破并冲向更高区域。高位出现较大波动后,价格开始持续回落,目前重新回到前期交易密集区域附近。 https://t.co/btpdCeYSrq 从走势结构来看,QENIS 目前更像是在经历 次强势行情后的重新定价。短线虽然卖压有所增加,但如果当前区域能够逐步企稳,并重新吸引买盘,后续仍有可能出现新的反弹节奏。接下来可以重点观察价格是否能够守住当前区域,以及成交活跃度能否再次回升。

    19611313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20264.8x their median

    近期 $WIWIWI 的走势再次成为市场讨论的焦点。从盘面来看,项目在经历了 轮快速上涨后,目前进入了相对理性的调整阶段。虽然短期价格出现 定回落,但整体市场热度并没有明显降温,反而吸引了更多投资者重新关注项目未来的发展潜力。对于许多交易者来说,这样的震荡整理属于市场运行中的正常节奏,也是资金重新布局的重要阶段。 个项目能否持续获得市场认可,并不仅仅取决于短时间的价格表现,更重要的是社区活跃度、生态建设以及团队执行力。从目前来看,WIWIWI 依然保持着不错的社区讨论热度,不少用户持续关注项目后续的产品更新、合作进展以及生态扩张情况。这种持续的关注度,也为项目未来的发展提供了更稳定的基础。 随着市场资金开始重新寻找具有成长潜力的项目,越来越多投资者开始将目光放在那些拥有长期规划和稳定社区支持的生态上。如果 WIWIWI 后续能够继续完善生态建设、推出新的应用场景,并吸引更多用户参与,其市场关注度仍有望进 步提升。短期波动或许难以避免,但真正决定项目长期价值的,依然是生态的发展速度、社区共识的积累以及团队持续兑现路线图的能力。因此,未来 WIWIWI 的后续表现,仍值得市场持续跟踪和关注。 CA: 3XEe11RMNqNTka33ik2yEmr3siUWmFQWSESP9Ejepump

    1961307.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.4x their median

    $MADE 在经历前期较长时间的震荡整理后,近期再次出现明显的上行走势,并快速突破此前的盘整区域。上涨过程中资金明显活跃,价格 度快速冲高,市场关注度也随之提升。@SelfMadebySP3ND https://t.co/3rjo89qGEf 冲高之后, MADE 开始进入高位震荡阶段,价格在较高区域反复波动。虽然短线出现 定回落,但整体仍维持在前期突破后的区域附近,说明市场并没有完全失去承接,当前更多是多空双方对后续方向进行博弈。 如果后续能够在当前区域稳定下来,并重新出现持续的买盘和成交量配合,行情仍有机会再次向上测试前期高点。相反,如果高位卖压持续增加,价格可能进 步回踩并寻找新的支撑。 整体来看, MADE 目前处于上涨后的关键整理阶段,接下来资金流向和价格能否重新走强值得持续关注。 CA: EpXtn6xGoZ4Y45vRjiDUHSCGbBoJD5FaEqZbF98YswH1

    245518.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.0x their median

    从整体走势来看, $GP 在经历前期整理后逐渐出现明显的资金推动,价格不断抬高,并在突破关键区域后进入加速阶段。上涨过程中成交活跃度同步放大,说明市场关注度和交易热度都有明显提升。@GPonchain CA: HTmQz7My6MehV7bjhJ6jde8nDND1yvsz68d24LP7YgUQ 随后价格快速冲高至前方高位区域,短线获利盘开始增加,价格出现较大幅度的震荡。不过回落过程中并没有持续走弱,而是在高位重新获得承接,随后再次向上反弹。目前价格仍维持在相对高位,整体结构依旧偏强。 值得注意的是,当前市场波动已经明显放大,多空双方博弈更加激烈。后续如果买方能够继续承接并突破前方高点,价格可能进 步测试更高区域;如果高位卖压持续增加,则可能先进入震荡整理,让市场消化前期涨幅。 整体而言, GP 当前走势仍保持较强的上升结构,资金活跃度也比较突出。接下来重点观察高位承接力度以及突破后的持续性。 https://t.co/M0tUTTTNKS

    270504.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.8x their median

    从走势来看, $INU 在经历前期快速拉升后出现明显回调,随后逐渐进入震荡整理阶段。近期 强波动性。 目前价格在震荡区间内运行,短线出现 定企稳迹象。可以看到买卖双方仍在持续博弈,如果后续买盘进 步增强并突破前期压力区域,市场情绪或有望再次升温;反之,如果支撑区域无法守住,则可能继续进入调整。 整体来看, INU 当前仍处于高波动阶段,后续重点关注成交量变化以及价格能否突破前期压力。随着市场关注度提升,后续走势仍值得持续观察。 https://t.co/HnPJDFjE5Z

    220804.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20263.4x their median

    $WTH 在经历前期上涨后,市场走势开始出现新的变化。近期价格在高位区域反复震荡,显示多空双方仍在争夺主导权。@whatthehookv4 从整体走势来看,虽然价格尚未重新突破此前高点,但买盘仍在尝试维持当前的价格区间。接下来,市场需要关注买方力量能否重新增强,以及交易活跃度是否能够持续。如果市场需求进 步回升, WTH 或有机会再次挑战前期高位;反之,若买盘减弱,短期调整压力也可能增加。 当前阶段,耐心观察趋势变化比盲目追逐波动更重要。 WTH 能否重新积累上涨动能,值得持续关注。 https://t.co/lNHbSGnRmM

    260103.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.4x their median

    $ZZZ 在经历前期持续上涨后,近期进入震荡整理阶段。整体走势依然保持在相对高位,虽然期间出现多次回调,但每次下跌后都能看到 定的承接,说明市场买盘并没有完全消失。 CA: 0x7dbf38976f6D3b9c529e7D9484A71898B409eE6a 从近期走势来看,价格在调整后逐渐形成新的震荡区间,并多次尝试向上突破。最近 次拉升后出现回落,但整体结构暂时没有明显破坏。如果后续买盘重新增强并突破前方压力,仍有机会再次向前期高位发起挑战。 目前 ZZZ 更适合关注震荡区间的突破方向以及后续成交量变化。只要承接力度保持,后续行情仍然值得继续关注。

    7118111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20263.3x their median

    $GLITCH 正在逐渐形成自己的市场节奏。经历初期快速拉升后,价格并没有立即失去活跃度,而是在相对高位持续震荡,显示市场参与者仍在关注后续的发展方向。@GlitchOnSolana_ 8Xg89xT8Ve34sKiYqYuMs46mycREsCA2F362UscRpump 对于这类代币而言,真正值得观察的不只是短期价格变化,还有市场热度能否延续,以及新的买盘是否愿意持续进场。如果后续能够积累更多交易活跃度,并逐步突破当前的整理区间,市场或许会迎来新的看点。 当然,持续上涨并非必然结果,价格波动和获利了结同样值得警惕。接下来, GLITCH 能否进 步巩固当前走势,并吸引更多市场关注,将是值得持续追踪的重点。 https://t.co/3mHDeelm7o

    250102.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 281K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.5K times each, and 0.228% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51 interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

What is 默默Kong(满血版)'s engagement rate on X?
默默Kong(满血版) (@KongEzza805) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 280,982 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, 默默Kong(满血版) sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KongEzza805 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KongEzza805 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going