Kim Dotcom engagement report
@KimDotcom - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.7K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 133K times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kim Dotcom's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.213%, Kim Dotcom sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 21% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 261 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 29, 202623x their median
The Official Charlie Kirk assassination story is now 100% dead! Candace Owens just dropped powerful never before seen surveillance video of the Losee Center rooftop. The video Owens released appears to be raw and unedited! This is the same footage that the court will not let the public see, that we are meant to believe is Tyler Robinson assassinating Charlie Kirk. The individual does not look like Tyler Robinson. The rifle is never pulled from his pants. The person in the footage has no limp. Nowhere do we see the shooter assembling the gun on the roof as we were told. No recoil is seen. He performs military maneuvers with precision as well as signaling before opening fire. The official narrative just COLLAPSED…
- Jul 31, 20269.0x their median
🚨Prof. Mohammad Marandi Completly DESTROYS Alan Dershowitz. 🚨“YOU’RE The Evil Monster!” 🚨"You are the Nazi regime that is carrying out a holocaust in Gaza. You're afraid because you know you have no argument. You are a coward. You won't let me talk. Epstein's lawyer, Trump's lawyer, is afraid of me. I let you talk because I'm not afraid of you. People are not afraid of you anymore. You can kill Epstein. You can kill whoever you like, but we're not afraid. You can bomb my house. You can kill me with my family, but I'm not afraid of you. I'm prepared to die for the Palestinian people. But you, you who used to frequent Epstein Island, you have no principles and no morality." Mohammad Marandi vs Alan Dershowitz on Iran
- Oct 23, 20267.7x their median
It looks like @netanyahu will lose the election in Israel and the Republicans will lose the midterms because of Trump. Very dangerous for Iran. Both men are desperate. Kudos to Iran for not being intimidated and not giving up against bullies and liars. Our hearts are with you.
- Sep 9, 20267.4x their median
Explosive report from Haaretz in Israel: Netanyahu knew about Oct 7. It means Netanyahu planned to commit a genocide against the Palestinians and Netanyahu sacrificed Israelis on Oct 7 to achieve that? Look at 9/11 and Charlie Kirk again. This guy needs to be stopped.
- Aug 13, 20266.3x their median
Bobby Fischer, the only American Chess World Champion, said this about Jews. https://t.co/TNCDOvTFLB
- Aug 14, 20266.2x their median
Looks like I’m back to my old reach, before the shadow ban. Thanks Elon. Just in time for my big drop. Are you ready?
- Jul 29, 20266.0x their median
If you are wondering why I post less it’s because X is messing with my account. Turns out Elon is not a free speech absolutist? Who would have thought?
- Aug 7, 20265.5x their median
Signal is not secure because it runs on iOS which has a lot of backdoors. Anything you run on Apple devices is not secure.
- Aug 14, 20265.4x their median
Hey @Grok Did Anthropic CEO’s wife invite Jeffrey Epstein to dinner, then ask him to fund her “luxury porn company” after he was already a convicted sex offender? Start with Yes or no. https://t.co/ihVYaO3B7q
- Jul 29, 20264.9x their median
Victoria Nuland finally admits it US officials and Boris Johnson killed the 2022 peace talks so the war could continue. Everything they’ve told you about Russia/Ukraine is a lie. https://t.co/tLM2eYPnDH
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.7K interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 133K times each, and 2.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 84K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.
- What is Kim Dotcom's engagement rate on X?
- Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) has an engagement rate of 0.213%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,719,609 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.213%, Kim Dotcom sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @KimDotcom have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @KimDotcom post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.