Back to @Khanya_Nolz1's profile

Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡© engagement report

@Khanya_Nolz1 - 191K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.08%
of 191K followers
Per impression
1.25%
165K views on a typical post
Reach
86.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
120 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.3/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 1.08%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 86.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 238K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #wanted.

Compared with accounts its own size

Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©'s engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.08%, Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡© sits above the 75th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.674% to 2.54%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,096 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 116 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 2026115x their median

    Ed Sheeran has lost over 500,000 followers on Instagram following his support of Israel https://t.co/34Xws8wtV7

    209K20K4.9K3.8K19M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202618x their median

    I remember begging my ex (who was white) to vote & I told him people literally died so we could have the right to vote and he said β€œyeah maybe for you, but not for me” 😭😭😭😭😭

    35K1.5K3271.1K873K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202611x their median

    A flat stomach in your 30s is the flex you think it is

    19K2.4K52411385K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.7x their median

    Finneas shares he has withdrawn from Ed Sheeran’s tour dates due to Ed’s complacency with genocide. https://t.co/eHBneVZ7Pn

    13K95759121184K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20265.5x their median

    Tjo, she is weird https://t.co/AJxSvgGFdg

    9.9K5243746054.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.9x their median

    Still at it… 2023 2026 https://t.co/PCwKHHirNX

    9.7K201521182.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.4x their median

    South Africa is not a Muslim country and will not convert to Islam!

    7.3K1.4K160143290K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20243.5x their median

    Abantu abaphilisa abanye abantu kabuhlungu emisebenzini really deserve hands.

    5.9K1.2K7972309K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.1x their median

    I was at Tops izolo standing in the que and a young chap was trying to get my attention. He said "Askies Timer". He repeated it until he tapped me on the shoulder. It did not occur to me AT ALL that he was actually speaking to me

    5.7K376200207427K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.3x their median

    Tsontso's uncle actually highlighted the danger of following a strict daily routine. Most of these culprits stalk potential victims before they attack.

    4.3K3752879438K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#wanted

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 1.08%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 165K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 86.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 238K interactions, about 115x its own typical post.

What is Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡©'s engagement rate on X?
Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡© (@Khanya_Nolz1) has an engagement rate of 1.08%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 191,453 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.08%, Khanya_Nolz1 πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡© sits above the 75th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Khanya_Nolz1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Khanya_Nolz1 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going