Back to @KevorkAlmassian's profile

Kevork Almassian engagement report

@KevorkAlmassian - 180K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.237%
of 180K followers
Per impression
2.04%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
11.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
428
interactions (median)
Saved
0.177%
37 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 428 interactions against 180K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kevork Almassian's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.237%, Kevork Almassian sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 226 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202620x their median

    ⚡️BREAKING: The Emir of Qatar is asking his Citizens to prepare for the Worst-Case Scenarios in the Middle East "We must be prepared for the worst possibilities and everyone must bear their responsibilities, institutions and citizens" https://t.co/XcgKd5vVZr

    6.6K1.6K265174938K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202612x their median

    EXCLUSIVE | Leaked emails reveal former German intelligence chief's Mossad links Emails obtained by The Cradle show Hanning had business and political ties to former Mossad director Dany Yatom. https://t.co/U9EXWwdqq1

    3.0K1.7K68178114K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20268.6x their median

    إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون. استهداف مطاري الملك خالد وأبها جريمة لا يبررها شيء؛ مدنيون أبرياء ومسافرون آمنون صاروا أهدافاً. اللهم ارحم من قُتلوا ظلماً واغفر لهم وتقبّلهم في الشهداء، واشفِ المصابين شفاءً عاجلاً، واربط على قلوب أهله

    3.1K19738937394K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.3x their median

    This is a blatant lie that Saudi money has normalized across the region. Ansar Allah—the “Houthis”—did not send any troops to Syria. That is Saudi propaganda. https://t.co/xPr9gM586i

    1.1K24142825K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.1x their median

    History will remember that many Syrians willingly chose humiliation and walked with their own feet into a hundred years of disgrace. They were not dragged there in chains. It was not imposed on them while they resisted to the last breath. They walked toward it willingly and cheered along the way. In the photo today: Netanyahu on the summit of Mount Hermon.

    1.0K253461327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.4x their median

    Syrians protesting rising fuel prices are not going to bring Bashar Assad back. That chapter is over. What Syria needs now is a figure who can unite the people around a national project, someone who cares about the well-being of Syrians, their sovereignty, and their future. Not foreign corporations. Not another ruler whose legitimacy depends on pleasing outsiders while his own people get poorer.

    85311263826K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.3x their median

    The reason Wahhabis say Assad was “worse than Netanyahu” is that they need to bury their shame. They helped radicalize and send tens of thousands of militants into Syria, cheered its destruction, and then embedded themselves in the U.S.-led regional order they once pretended to oppose.

    741208231234K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20262.3x their median

    Is it really a coincidence that the same talking heads who spent years telling you “Assad is worse than Netanyahu” are now siding with Saudi Arabia and Israel against Ansar Allah in Yemen? https://t.co/C2QRCiJffa

    74721811617K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.1x their median

    Tehran has twice urged Ansarallah to accept a ceasefire with Saudi Arabia and Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also offered to mediate. Tehran appears to be prioritising regional stability and de-escalation, while Ansarallah insists that its military position will not be used as a bargaining chip for Iranian interests.

    6166018838173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.9x their median

    Syria is now being opened to privatization, with the promise that integration into the global economy will bring prosperity. But exactly the opposite is happening. In this video, I explain why Syrians are protesting against the Jolani regime. https://t.co/ELS4ScaH7s

    6181739728K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 428 interactions against 180K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is Kevork Almassian's engagement rate on X?
Kevork Almassian (@KevorkAlmassian) has an engagement rate of 0.237%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,022 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.237%, Kevork Almassian sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KevorkAlmassian have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KevorkAlmassian post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going