Back to @KevinSzabo14's profile

Kevin Szabo engagement report

@KevinSzabo14 - 60K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.109%
of 60K followers
Per impression
3.55%
1.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
66
interactions (median)
Saved
0.108%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 3.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 150 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kevin Szabo's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.109%, Kevin Szabo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 183 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 20262.3x their median

    No Plan B. 
Just Plan A, and the commitment to make it work. 
Quitting isn't on the table.

    110132522.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.0x their median

    Create an X account. Choose a single topic. Master one skill. Find the people who need it. Slide into their DMs. Over-deliver on the first job. Get a testimonial. Turn it into a case study. Share it daily. Let the inbound DMs find you. Repeat.

    10661903.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Give it a day you’ll get a day. Give it a year you’ll get a year. The deadline decides over your plan. My suggestion would be to tighten deadlines.

    6341911.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Real critics build. Haters are just talk. No skin in the game. No wins on the board. Their opinion isn't worth your peace.

    5851911.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    AI doesn’t fix bad thinking. You’re just stupid.

    5112201.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    In my experience. Rich people are actually some of the nicest people you’ll ever meet. People who lack are the ones who hate the most. They either complain about problems only they can fix or never take a second to recognize gratitude. Then blame everyone but themselves.

    4661911.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    My biggest competitive advantage is that I’m having fun. Truth be told. Most hate the work because it’s the wrong work. If you don’t love writing as much as I do.. Why are you on here?

    5321601.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    The average person reads about 238 words per minute. 1,000 word article means your reader is spending 4 minutes of their life. But is it always worth 4 minutes? If you can say it in 400 words, they’ll remember that. I learned that the best writers are direct, not extra.

    4831601.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    When you see someone winning and your first thought is: "They got lucky." "Must be nice." Your brain sees that as: success is for other people. Not you. Now that’s a dangerous line to be playing with.

    5121301.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Stop trying to sound like an expert all the time. Nobody wants to listen, let alone work with a 24/7 hard-ass. Instead start documenting what you're actually learning right now and share it with people. "Here's what I tried this week, with results" Beats "here's my definitive framework" Every time because it's specific, honest, and easy to trust.

    4341811.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 66 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 3.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 150 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

What is Kevin Szabo's engagement rate on X?
Kevin Szabo (@KevinSzabo14) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 59,919 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.109%, Kevin Szabo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KevinSzabo14 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KevinSzabo14 post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going