Back to @KentBeck's profile

Kent Beck 🌻 engagement report

@KentBeck - 187K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.074%
of 187K followers
Per impression
0.68%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.128%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 272x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.074%, Kent Beck 🌻 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 246 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 4, 2026272x their median

    Our internal data shows Claude is accelerating AI developmentβ€”a possible path to recursive self-improvement, or AI autonomously building a more capable successor. It’s happening faster than we thought, and the implications deserve greater attention. https://t.co/OVVPJO7VQx

    28K4.5K1.7K3.0K19M viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 202613x their median

    Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei): "Coding is going away first, then all of software engineering." What do you think about this? https://t.co/p25uTjB6k3

    904603724092.7M viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 20263.0x their median

    Claude has passed the threshold to being completely unusable for me for coding. Timeouts, infinite (seeming) stalls, forget it. Someone let me know when it comes back from wherever it went. (And this with a Pro plan)

    4092342641K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20263.2x their median

    Programming lost its flow state. The agent world feels more like air traffic control. What I miss most: feeling oriented, a sense of mastery. That loss is emotional, and when software gets fiddly, practical too. More on Still Burning: https://t.co/hB2v13obl0

    3684522523K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.5x their median

    It's been interesting watching mathematicians saying, "We prove theorems. The genie proves theorems better. Who are we now?" Programmers wen't through the same thing 2 years ago--we code, the genie codes better (for some definition of better), who are we now?

    1751223223K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    What would happen if we used the Genie not to program faster, but to master programming faster? Would we get more or less accomplished along the way?

    1501129119K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 2026

    Programming isn't going away β€” it's splitting in two. @jessitron on Still Burning: "If you want to build a bookshelf, that's a craft. But there's also IKEA." The code-crafting got commoditized. Knowing what to build didn't. New episode: https://t.co/OoE0CUWang

    145258220K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026

    An AI safety team should keep one person who never uses LLMs, in their whole life. The worry is a slow con, these tools quietly earning trust. You'd want someone whose immunity stays intact. #StillBurning

    155814119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    πŸš€ Announcing ByteByteGo Live: learn AI live from real builders. I’ve spent the past 8 years on education: thousands of hours writing books, deep dive newsletters, YouTube, etc. Two issues I keep seeing are: 1) it’s very different to learn from real builders. 2) most online courses never get finished (~4% completion). Over the past 12 months, we’ve been working on what we can do to change that. Today, I’m excited to announce ByteByteGo Live: live cohort courses taught by real builders. - Taught by real builders. Our instructors include very senior engineers from Google, Meta, etc., as well as @KentBeck , the creator of TDD. They teach what they use in their own work. - Live cohorts. Every course runs live with a group of people, and instructors answer your questions in real time. The current lineup: - AI Engineering Fundamentals - Build with Claude Code - Build Production Grade AI Systems - Rebuild YouTube with AI - AI Evals in Practice - AI Cost Optimization - Trust-optimized AI Development We have big plans for the year ahead: more courses, more instructors, and deeper hands on projects. Check out https://t.co/8veGTRgo22 and let us know what you think.

    138236225K viewsView on X
  • Apr 22, 2026

    I think now is a great time to be a junior developer. But I'm worried. The pressure juniors feel: I was hired to do a thing. The faster I do it, the prouder they'll be. But you can go very fast in exactly the wrong direction. The most important skill, stepping back and starting over, is being optimized away. Ep. 03 of Still Burning is out now. https://t.co/Qbzib1mnzt

    123167317K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 272x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Kent Beck 🌻's engagement rate on X?
Kent Beck 🌻 (@KentBeck) has an engagement rate of 0.074%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 186,840 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.074%, Kent Beck 🌻 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KentBeck have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @KentBeck post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going