Back to @KenDBerryMD's profile

Ken D Berry MD engagement report

@KenDBerryMD - 315K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.139%
of 315K followers
Per impression
2.88%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
4.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
437
interactions (median)
Saved
0.139%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 437 interactions against 315K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #theproperhumandiet.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ken D Berry MD's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.139%, Ken D Berry MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link35% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 323 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 202666x their median

    We need a different word for places that warm frozen Sysco food and bring it to you because that isn’t the same thing as a restaurant

    27K1.1K7121201.3M viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 202120x their median

    Once upon a time, a small-town doctor decided to pull back the curtain on modern medicine so regular folks could see how it really works. I never dreamed 3000 people would read Lies, much less review it. Thank you!! Link: https://t.co/2sRNFg8xXj https://t.co/5KtPZjTrqU

    6.4K1.4K613114View on X
  • Aug 16, 20265.1x their median

    Some people Need to be Carnivore. No body needs to be vegan.

    2.0K11558946K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20265.0x their median

    People will hate me for this, but you can order a perfectly healthy meal at McDonald's. 100% beef, seared in its own fat, not a drop of seed oil in sight. And five other chains do the same. - McDonald's: clamshell grill, salt and pepper only. - Burger King: gas flame broiler, no pan. - Shake Shack: flat top, no grease on the plate. - Wendy's: clamshell grill, same principle. - Steak n Shake: flat top, smashed to order. - Carl's Jr: charbroiled over gas. The oil is in the fries, the bun and the mayonnaise. All three optional. Take them off and you are left with ruminant meat, seared hard, with dairy on it. The exact plate you would pay thirty quid for if a man in an apron carried it over on a board. Half of you would sooner drive forty more miles hungry than be seen holding it. The arches are not an ingredient.

    1.7K15925521157K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20264.9x their median

    Meat and eggs contain little to no carbohydrate, so they don't cause the blood sugar spikes that breads, cereals, pasta, rice, sugary drinks, and other ultra-processed foods do. Instead of constantly chasing high blood sugar with more medication, remove the food that's driving the problem in the first place. For more videos on reversing insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and living a Proper Human Diet, head over to my YouTube channel. #Type2Diabetes #Prediabetes #BloodSugar #InsulinResistance #ProperHumanDiet

    1.8K27646948K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.0x their median

    Vegans cause the death of more animals than Carnivores.

    1.6K111731252K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.6x their median

    There are essential amino acids. There are essential fatty acids. There are no essential sugars.

    1.4K125561245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.0x their median

    Your body can make sugar any time it needs sugar.

    1.2K6262742K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.8x their median

    Salt has been blamed for decades, but sodium is an essential mineral your body needs for healthy nerve function, muscle contraction, hydration, and maintaining blood volume. For many people, the conversation isn't simply "eat less salt." It should be about understanding your individual health, eating real food, and recognizing when outdated nutrition advice doesn't fit the evidence. #TheProperHumanDiet

    1.0K17045821K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20262.6x their median

    Stop eating fake protein. They take ultra processed junk, add a little whey protein, print HIGH PROTEIN across the front, and hope you'll mistake it for real food. Don't fall for it. If you want protein, eat protein. Beef Eggs Fish Chicken Real protein comes packaged with the nutrients your body actually needs. It keeps you full longer, helps maintain muscle, supports a healthy metabolism, and gives your body real fuel instead of empty marketing. "But Dr. Berry, meat is too expensive." That's simply not true. Head to my YouTube channel and watch "Carnivore on a Budget: 10 Cheap Foods That Actually Work." I'll show you affordable, nutrient-dense foods that cost less than many of these so-called "protein" snacks and will nourish you far better. #ProperHumanDiet #Carnivore #Keto #HighProtein #Nutrition

    99111731633K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#theproperhumandiet

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 437 interactions against 315K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 2.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

What is Ken D Berry MD's engagement rate on X?
Ken D Berry MD (@KenDBerryMD) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 314,979 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.139%, Ken D Berry MD sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KenDBerryMD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KenDBerryMD post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going