Back to @KelemenCari's profile

Cari Kelemen engagement report

@KelemenCari - 193K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.104%
of 193K followers
Per impression
7.75%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
201
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 201 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 7.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 147x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cari Kelemen's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, Cari Kelemen sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 2026147x their median

    THIS IS GENIUS! Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick just announced plans to use the Postal Service to conduct the Census instead of wasting billions. USPS workers will also replace 20,000 Social Security workers. "We spend $40 billion every 10 years doing the census. And that means we hire 625,000 people. And they go, and they rent cars and gas, and you pay them food... They go to every household and count the people." "What department do we already have that already employs 625,000 people? It's got cars, already has gas, and goes to every household. [Answer: USPS]." "They can go to your house when you have a baby and give you the form for Social Security. And the 20,000 Social Security officers that we have, we just don't need them. We actually can do real customer service." "Let's use the assets of the government to make us better and save us money." IT'S SO GENIUS!

    24K4.8K938207445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202695x their median

    JOE SCARBOROUGH SAYS HIS WIFE LOST HER BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND WILL NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE, BECAUSE THEY CANNOT FIND IT ANYWHERE. https://t.co/07BNekgh0h

    3.5K64014K1.0K501K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202622x their median

    DFW hits 58 straight days without rain, tying the 3rd-longest dry streak on record https://t.co/4B9ZQgA7qD

    3.8K332152143176K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202312x their median

    Homeschooling has exploded since 2020. If you are thinking about it, but you have questions or concerns, Consider Homeschooling can help. Go to https://t.co/qRCcZG9LIp and use the code FREESHIPUSA for free shipping in the USA. Ebook, PDF and audiobook also available. https://t.co/wAPY75jyfT

    1.5K69726046494K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.7x their median

    Praying for America: If you return to God and put right all the wrong in your home, then you will be restored. (Job 22:23) Restore us, Lord! Help each us do what we can within our own homes to turn away from evil and return to You. In Jesus' name 🙏🏼

    220675913.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.5x their median

    I have huge polling information breaking at the top of the hour.

    2732012266K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Praying for America: I pray that Christ Jesus and the church will forever bring praise to God. His power at work in us can do far more than we dare ask or imagine. (Ephesians 3:20,21) Lord, use Your power at work in us to do more than we dare to imagine. In Jesus' name🙏🏼

    173544402.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    Praying for America: You have seen me tossing and turning through the night. You have collected all my tears and preserved them in Your bottle! You have recorded every one in Your book. (Psalm 56:8) Lord, thank you for remembering every single tear. In Jesus' name🙏🏼

    167514842.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Praying for America: God is strong and always wins. He controls those who fool others and those who are fooled. (Job 12:16) Lord, nothing and no one can keep Your plans from succeeding. In Jesus' name🙏🏼

    174503612.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Praying for America: Be of use to God; be at peace with Him and goodness will return to your life. Receive instruction directly from His lips, and make His words a part of you. (Job 22:21,22) Lord, help us to listen to Your Word and become of use to You. In Jesus' name🙏🏼

    152524112.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 201 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 7.75% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 147x its own typical post.

What is Cari Kelemen's engagement rate on X?
Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 192,572 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, Cari Kelemen sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KelemenCari have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KelemenCari post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going