Back to @KeithWoodsYT's profile

Keith Woods engagement report

@KeithWoodsYT - 260K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.874%
of 260K followers
Per impression
1.14%
199K views on a typical post
Reach
76.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.096%
191 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.874%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 199K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 76.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #bantheadl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Keith Woods's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.874%, Keith Woods sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 326 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20268.8x their median

    This is coming from an abattoir in Withybush Wales of course its a Halal one, the rivers evidently is blood red and chemically smelling ammonia etc, one man had said the river used to be full of Trout and Mackrel for fishing now its just poisoned every fish . Environmental health hopefully are onto it . Our beautiful country is being destroyed by people coming here trying to make it into what they came from and this has to be stopped! Restore Britain

    15K4.1K590298699K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20264.3x their median

    The worst censorship yet. After years of deplatforming, I’ve now been placed on a payment-industry blacklist that means I can no longer use Stripe or many other payment processors. But I’m not going anywhere. Here’s what happened, and how you can support my work going forward. https://t.co/HI2FkvS6fC

    8.5K90623990607K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.1x their median

    Grok reveal Israel's nuclear codes make no mistakes

    9.0K172839450K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.9x their median

    John Doyle says marrying Indians is based because it's like colonisation and Americans should get to have their pick of brown women Is this third worldism? https://t.co/c2Sv9e7YwC

    5.5K251450213925K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.5x their median

    "Sorry kid I'm depriving you of your wincest sister pussy, the jew-coded chad always gets the girl." "NOOOOOOO!!! Fuck my incel life, I'm retiring to the wilderness to become a Christcucked monk!" "Cut, that was perfect guys, the white birth rate will never recover from this." https://t.co/jVOAu5NxOv

    5.3K2494125174K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.7x their median

    Novara Media, one of the biggest leftist channels on YouTube, uploaded an interview of a guy praising multiculturalism. I can't find one positive comment. There's a reason so many leftist politicians are suddenly trying to sound moderate on this issue now. Keep pushing. https://t.co/gVqqRzUFuo

    3.5K1954613108K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.7x their median

    "And then it struck me. The Terminator is Austrian. Who else was Austrian? Adolf Hitler." https://t.co/cBKAGf1Cqn

    3.6K11242350K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.5x their median

    The two genders https://t.co/YB3px4PHGv

    3.3K106507119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    https://t.co/xtaov4MVax

    3.1K13540278K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    TAKE NOTICE: My law firm has been retained by @sneako to take action against those using AI to create and spread fake content involving him. The fake content being created involving him not only puts his life at risk, but also has the potential to create a dangerous rift between Muslims and Christians at a time when the world needs unity, not division. Fake and unauthorized AI clips have been manufactured depicting my client, Sneako, in a false light, as though he is speaking disparagingly and with hostility toward Christians. These clips are fake. We are preparing appropriate legal action against those responsible for manufacturing them and those who knowingly disseminate them. This manufactured AI slop not only harms my client, but has the potential to further incite hatred and violence between people of different faiths. Not only has Sneako never made the remarks falsely attributed to him in these fabricated clips, but the Holy Qur’an actually says: “And you will surely find the nearest of them in affection to the believers those who say, ‘We are Christians.’ That is because among them are priests and monks and because they are not arrogant.” — Qur’an 5:82 We are asking anyone knowingly sharing fake AI content falsely attributed to my client to immediately delete it and post a correction. My law firm, Muslim Legal, will not hesitate to pursue appropriate legal action against those who knowingly manufacture or disseminate fabricated content falsely attributed to my client, where supported by the facts and the law. Consider this formal notice.

    2.4K26436427288K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bantheadl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.874%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 199K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 76.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

What is Keith Woods's engagement rate on X?
Keith Woods (@KeithWoodsYT) has an engagement rate of 0.874%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 259,741 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.874%, Keith Woods sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KeithWoodsYT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KeithWoodsYT post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going