Back to @Kasparov63's profile

Garry Kasparov engagement report

@Kasparov63 - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.12%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
1.38%
96K views on a typical post
Reach
8.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
46 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.67/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gctfinals, #grandchesstour, #daznmoseshrgovic.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #gctfinals, #grandchesstour, #daznmoseshrgovic.

Compared with accounts its own size

Garry Kasparov's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.12%, Garry Kasparov sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 202636x their median

    Mamdani’s rent advisor is 4 years behind on her rent You literally cannot make this up.

    41K5.9K376149608K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202620x their median

    BREAKING: Russian officials have briefed Iran that the CIA Director Ratcliffe's Moscow visit delivered a message with the US asking Moscow to press Iran into reopening the Strait of Hormuz, warning that Russian entities would otherwise face designations under Operation Economic Outcast. Russia declined, and told Iran the threatened measures were of limited consequence, according to two senior Iranian sources with knowledge of the briefing. The message also warned that Russian banks, traders and shipping entities tied to Iranian oil, gold and aviation will be sanctioned under the operation unless Moscow moves to close those channels.

    21K4.0K8627604.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202617x their median

    WELKER: Susan Collins says Trump's Canada tariffs will increase costs on American families. Is she right? TIM SCOTT: Let's look back at Joe Biden-- WELKER: Wait. President Trump has been in office for two years. Inflation was at 3% when Biden left office. It's at 3.4% right now. SCOTT: Joe Biden ... WELKER: The Biden administration is over!

    18K3.2K9383101.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202610x their median

    Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have canceled their planned trip to Kyiv because of “heavy russian air strikes on the city.” Witkoff and Kushner have traveled to Moscow eight times for meetings with Putin. But when it comes to visiting Kyiv, russian air strikes suddenly make the trip too dangerous. Meanwhile, presidents and prime ministers from a dozen European countries have visited Kyiv over the past several days — despite those very same russian attacks. This tells you something important about American diplomacy under Trump. For months, we have been told that Witkoff and Kushner are trying to broker peace between russia and Ukraine. Yet the people supposedly acting as intermediaries repeatedly travel to Moscow, meet with Putin, listen to russia’s demands - and cannot even bring themselves to travel to the capital of the country russia is invading. You cannot understand this war by visiting Moscow eight times and Kyiv zero times. And you certainly cannot be an honest broker if you are willing to sit comfortably across the table from the aggressor but are too afraid to visit the victim because the aggressor might bomb you. European leaders are showing what solidarity looks like. Washington is showing what cowardliness and complacency look like.

    9.7K3.1K630286388K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.3x their median

    HOST: Will Russia use nuclear weapons? STUBB: No. HOST: Why are you so sure about that? STUBB: For instance, I had Foreign Minister of China visiting me this summer. I raised this issue, and he said, “We will never allow it to happen.” I think, that’s a pretty good deterrent. https://t.co/bnjjpoILI0

    9.3K1.2K285127968K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.0x their median

    Congratulations to Ukraine on its Independence Day! 🇺🇦 Now more than ever, Ukraine is teaching the world the meaning of independence and how and why it must be fought for. A great shame that it is still fighting alone against Russia and its axis allies.

    7.7K1.3K2692365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.6x their median

    THIS. IS. HUGE. 🇬🇧🇺🇦 Britain will declassify and share information on the British components of the long-range SCALP cruise missile, allowing France and Ukraine to move forward with plans for local assembly in Ukraine. Prime Minister Andy Burnham is expected to announce the decision during his visit to Kyiv today. Thank you, Britain. This is how long-term security is actually built!

    7.0K1.3K36674340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.6x their median

    Trump's stupid chart of "greatest" presidents is a chart from Life Magazine in 1948, with his name added at the top and the Democrats he doesn't like at the bottom. Exactly the kind of thing a healthy, high-functioning person shares. https://t.co/ugUoImCnTb

    7.6K732180148418K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.1x their median

    Here is a thought experiment that several analysts keep returning to: if a president actually wanted to dismantle American superpower status, what would he be doing differently from what Trump is doing right now? Consider the record. He has feuded with NATO and cast doubt on the alliance guarantee that anchored Western security for 70 years. He has slapped tariffs on the EU and individual European allies, and this week launched a 50 percent trade war against Canada, America's closest partner. He has pressured South Korea and Japan over troop costs while courting their adversaries. Gulf states, battered by the Iran war, now question the American security umbrella so openly that Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan just signed their own mutual defence pact. Sanctions and Hormuz chaos are pushing oil trade toward the yuan, eroding the dollar's reserve role while national debt passes 40 trillion. And through it all, he speaks warmly of Putin and Kim Jong Un while insulting the billion people living under allied flags. Superpower status rests on three pillars: alliances, the dollar, and credibility. All three are being sawed at simultaneously. So what explains it? Option A: sheer ignorance, a government that simply does not understand how the world works. Option B: revenge, a man settling scores with an establishment he believes wronged him. Option C: outside pressure, someone else's interests being served. None of these options is comforting. And the pattern remains the same whichever one you pick.

    5.5K2.1K266128257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.7x their median

    GOOD NEWS: Finland cuts all funding to UNRWA. 🇫🇮 FM Ville Tavio: “The support agreement between Finland and UNRWA during the previous Social Democrat government ends, and I have not granted it an extension.” Funding for Palestinians will go to non-UNRWA agencies such as WFP.

    6.2K1.2K83105193K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gctfinals#grandchesstour#daznmoseshrgovic#kherson#otd

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gctfinals, #grandchesstour, #daznmoseshrgovic.

What is Garry Kasparov's engagement rate on X?
Garry Kasparov (@Kasparov63) has an engagement rate of 0.12%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,102,027 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.12%, Garry Kasparov sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Kasparov63 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Kasparov63 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going