PlayerSells
Back to @Karchezzz's profile

Karchez engagement report

@Karchezzz - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
1.45%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
3.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
813
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 813 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #karchez26bday.

Compared with accounts its own size

Karchez's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Karchez sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,151 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.047% to 0.324%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.324%
p902.53%
p99360.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,151 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 450,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.324%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile360.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +9%7.2K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 20, 202682x their median

    This is how striking speed changes with and without weight 😳 https://t.co/KiBjcmN1eF

    64K1.6K56824735M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202637x their median

    Falleció el boxeo, pereció el guante

    28K2.2K13552928K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202622x their median

    Lo peor, es que si es tan duro el casco, le viene hasta peor para los golpes a roro xd

    18K26516912687K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202620x their median

    Donald Trump: bombardeo medio mundo Donald trump tambien: que salgan 20 niños a decir que amor para todo el mundo

    14K1.9K3932192K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202615x their median

    Igualmente, es una guarrada lo que esta pasando eh

    12K262715499K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202614x their median

    Ganar siendo tan superior que hay gente pensando que Argentina se dejó ganar. Eso es esta España eh.

    10K520689119K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 202613x their median

    El no lo sabe, pero iba depilado por si acaso https://t.co/fwOdkKYdK2

    9.7K68671113136K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202613x their median

    QUITATE DE LA FOTO RETRASADO

    9.9K522248151K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202613x their median

    PONEDME A J HOPE HIJOS DEPUTAAAAA

    8.9K1.2K9032163K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20267.2x their median

    Gracias Luis, por sembrar. https://t.co/xg15YsXjCS

    5.6K2975249K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#karchez26bday

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 813 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 67K interactions, about 82x its own typical post.

What is Karchez's engagement rate on X?
Karchez (@Karchezzz) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,695,962 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Karchez sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,151 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Karchezzz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Karchezzz post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going