Kane Fox 🦊 engagement report
@KaneFoxxx - 547K followers on X
Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 547K followers, an engagement rate of 0.289%. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 70x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.289%, Kane Fox 🦊 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 298 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Dec 20, 202470x their median
Here to fulfill all your bi vers needs 😏 https://t.co/NzNHL9Ge4c https://t.co/PN47beETc5
- Aug 5, 202633x their median
Do porn stars have welcome to the league moments?
- Jul 27, 202622x their median
the ACTUAL pyramid of pop music https://t.co/xh3OfBseGu
- Jul 23, 202617x their median
François Arnaud strips down and turns up the heat in new Under Armour ad 🔥 https://t.co/HPe132AJmV
- Jun 28, 20268.1x their median
I FORGOT ABOUT THIS SKSNSNX https://t.co/WIdokPPfpO
- Sep 8, 202612x their median
New dorm mate can’t stop bouncing on my dick 😶🌫️ @DexDevall https://t.co/0nQ6zKGs5g
- Sep 24, 20268.5x their median
One thing early Friends got very right was never making Joey look like some overly polished fantasy of a “hot guy.” Season 1 Matt LeBlanc had the baby face, the chest hair, the slightly rough-around-the-edges 90s thing, and somehow that made the whole “every woman wants Joey Tribbiani” running joke completely believable.
- Aug 13, 20263.2x their median
The fact that she was the taylor swift of the music industry at one point… https://t.co/1PW5hdwwj7
- Sep 30, 20262.3x their median
Tiktok Morals are fascinating https://t.co/9EnIV3HasH
- Aug 19, 20262.1x their median
Roomie caught me watching porn said he could help out 😴 @DexDevall https://t.co/xtLN105Ws2
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 547K followers, an engagement rate of 0.289%. Posts are seen about 67K times each, and 2.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 110K interactions, about 70x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Kane Fox 🦊's engagement rate on X?
- Kane Fox 🦊 (@KaneFoxxx) has an engagement rate of 0.289%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 546,570 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.289%, Kane Fox 🦊 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @KaneFoxxx have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @KaneFoxxx post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.