Back to @Kaisen_Tobiuo's profile

ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ engagement report

@Kaisen_Tobiuo - 541K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.612%
of 541K followers
Per impression
5.59%
59K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.533%
315 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3.3K interactions against 541K followers, an engagement rate of 0.612%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #็Œซใฎๆ‰‹.

Compared with accounts its own size

ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.612%, ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.436% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 6, 202630x their median

    ๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿฅ•๐’—๐’†๐’ˆ๐’†๐’•๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’๐’†๐’”๐Ÿฅฌ๐Ÿฅฆ https://t.co/0oTGA6aGf5

    90K8.9K01471.6M viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 202615x their median

    ใฎใณ๏ฝž๏ฝž๏ผ๏ผ๐Ÿˆ https://t.co/Ukbk52V4iN

    45K4.5K016624K viewsView on X
  • Dec 14, 20237.2x their median

    ๆ–ฐใ—ใ„็”ป้›†ใŒใงใพใ™๏ผ ใ€ŽVIOLAใ€€ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌไฝœๅ“้›†ใ€ใŒ2024/1/19ใซ็™บๅฃฒใ—ใพใ™๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ้™ๅฎš็‰ˆใ‚‚ๅ‡บใ—ใฆ้ ‚ใ‘ใ‚‹ใฟใŸใ„ใชใฎใง็ถšๅ ฑใ‚’ใŠๅพ…ใก้ ‚ใ‘ใ‚‹ใจๅฌ‰ใ—ใ„ใงใ™๏ผ๏ผ ใฟใชใ•ใพใฎใ•ใ•ใ‚„ใ‹ใชๅคขใฎใฒใจๆ™‚ใซใชใ‚Œใฐๅฌ‰ใ—ใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ https://t.co/MSXuQLe897 https://t.co/J2hapyPs7k

    21K2.8K27771.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.9x their median

    ๅ…‰่ฏ https://t.co/1KYqBPt40N

    12K1.2K010190K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20263.8x their median

    https://t.co/rZEvP5LGn5

    11K1.2K04189K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20263.5x their median

    ๐Ÿ”น๐Ÿ”น๐‘€๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘–๐‘›๐‘”๐Ÿ”น๐Ÿ”น https://t.co/T0pKh3DvHp

    10K1.1K04165K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20263.4x their median

    โ™ฆ๏ธ๐ธ๐‘™ ๐‘ฃ๐‘–๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘œ ๐‘‘๐‘’ ๐‘™๐‘Ž ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘–รณ๐‘› https://t.co/r6hcIXipcf

    10K1.0K02142K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20263.0x their median

    https://t.co/7xXAtcQG5A

    9.2K84408303K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20262.8x their median

    ็ง˜ๅฏ† https://t.co/bfpTEqkIIH

    8.4K88900148K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20262.7x their median

    ๐Ÿˆ็Œซใฎๆ‰‹โ€”Cat Maidsโ€”ใ€€2่ฉฑ๐Ÿˆ ่ฆ‹ใฆใญ๐Ÿž๐Ÿฅ–๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿซ“๐Ÿฅจ https://t.co/iuN39WwMwX

    8.2K85855222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#็Œซใฎๆ‰‹

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.3K interactions against 541K followers, an engagement rate of 0.612%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 59K times each, and 5.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ's engagement rate on X?
ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ (@Kaisen_Tobiuo) has an engagement rate of 0.612%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 540,640 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.612%, ๆตทๅณถๅƒๆœฌ๐ŸŸ sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Kaisen_Tobiuo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Kaisen_Tobiuo post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going