Back to @KNVB's profile

KNVB engagement report

@KNVB - 405K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 405K followers
Per impression
0.141%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #vierhetvoetbal.

Compared with accounts its own size

KNVB's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, KNVB sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 13, 2026107x their median

    We zijn geschrokken en diepbedroefd door het overlijden van Rob Dieperink. Met Rob verliezen we een zeer gewaardeerde scheidsrechter, maar bovenal een fijne en betrokken collega. Onze gedachten gaan uit naar zijn familie, vrienden en iedereen die hem dierbaar was. We wensen hen veel kracht en sterkte toe bij het verwerken van dit grote verlies.

    2.4K1339116439K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202662x their median

    ๐—ข๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ. ๐—ข๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—™๐—œ๐—™๐—”. ๐—ข๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—™๐˜‚๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ. Lees meer over ons statement via https://t.co/lmbsFsSEnE. https://t.co/2c8MugKJkk

    1.3K146492673K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202633x their median

    De KNVB is blij dat de FIFA het voorstel heeft ingetrokken. Dat is een belangrijk en verstandig besluit. Vanaf het begin hebben wij, samen met de UEFA en de andere Europese bonden, duidelijk gemaakt dat zowel de inhoud van het voorstel als de manier waarop het tot stand is gekomen voor ons onacceptabel waren. Met het intrekken van het voorstel is de kwestie voor de KNVB niet afgedaan. De manier waarop dit proces is verlopen heeft geleid tot een fundamentele vertrouwensbreuk in het leiderschap van FIFA-voorzitter Gianni Infantino. De KNVB heeft geen vertrouwen meer in zijn leiderschap. Dat blijkt niet alleen uit de zorgen die bonden wereldwijd hebben geuit, maar ook uit de kritiek en zorgen die binnen de FIFA-organisatie zelf leven. Deze situatie vraagt om een serieus gesprek over de toekomst van het bestuur en leiderschap binnen de FIFA. Deze uitkomst laat zien hoe belangrijk het is dat besluiten over de toekomst van het internationale voetbal op een transparante manier en in goed overleg met alle betrokken partijen worden genomen. De KNVB blijft zich samen met de UEFA en bonden wereldwijd inzetten voor goed bestuur en een sterk internationaal voetbal, waarin het belang van de sport altijd vooropstaat.

    687557316133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202623x their median

    De ๐—จ๐—˜๐—™๐—” ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฝ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ in de Johan Cruijff ArenA! ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/WxFenFzzxo

    51242112128K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 202614x their median

    Dallas kleurt Oranje! ๐Ÿงก๐Ÿ˜ Heel veel succes tegen Japan, @OnsOranje! ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ #NothingLikeOranje #FIFAWorldCup #NEDJPN https://t.co/9JAtIXKA3Q

    2383717314K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20269.4x their median

    Het afsteken van vuurwerk in het stadion is verboden, ongezond, gevaarlijk en staat haaks op waar voetbal voor hoort te staan. Het dupeert spelers, officials en supporters en kan bovendien leiden tot ernstige gevolgen, zoals bij de supporters die door het vuurwerk zijn geraakt. Wie zich hieraan schuldig maakt, heeft niets in het stadion te zoeken. We doen er alles aan om de daders op te sporen en stevig te bestraffen. Zij kunnen onder meer een landelijk stadionverbod verwachten voor het afsteken van vuurwerk. Het voetbal is beter af zonder deze personen. Competitiebestuur Betaald Voetbal (KNVB, ECV en CED)

    17029036111K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20268.8x their median

    Wow! Wรกt een support in Kansas City! ๐Ÿงก๐Ÿคฏ Succes tegen Tunesiรซ, @OnsOranje! ๐Ÿ‘Š #NothingLikeOranje #FIFAWorldCup #TUNNED https://t.co/CjZzsp6Jym

    1812512213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20265.4x their median

    ๐—ช๐—œ๐—ก๐—ก๐—”๐—”๐—ฅย ๐—๐—ข๐—›๐—”๐—กย ๐—–๐—ฅ๐—จ๐—œ๐—๐—™๐—™ย ๐—ฆ๐—–๐—›๐—”๐—”๐—Ÿย ๐Ÿ† Gefeliciteerd, @AZAlkmaar!ย ๐Ÿค https://t.co/rt2g6SNQFL

    112175115K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20265.0x their median

    Monterrey kleurt Oranje ๐Ÿงก Wat een sfeer, samen achter Oranje! ๐Ÿ˜ #NothingLikeOranje #FIFAWorldCup #NEDMAR https://t.co/wQqX1qXTzo

    77938114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20264.6x their median

    Een gouden schaal voor de landskampioen vanwege het 70-jarig jubileum van het betaald voetbal ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/4dXopnQwKt

    756034104K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vierhetvoetbal

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 405K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 107x its own typical post.

What is KNVB's engagement rate on X?
KNVB (@KNVB) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 404,887 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, KNVB sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KNVB have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KNVB post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going