Back to @K89782's profile

カナ engagement report

@K89782 - 264K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.269%
of 264K followers
Per impression
1.11%
64K views on a typical post
Reach
24.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
712
interactions (median)
Saved
0.143%
92 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

カナ's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.269%, カナ sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 202636x their median

    スリコとナイクラコラボのめじるしアクセサリー2つで¥330とは思えんキラッキラで可愛すぎる… https://t.co/drA0hizICT

    24K1.0K202511.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202628x their median

    ココイチとちいかわコラボのスプーン置くやつ、スパチュラ置きにしても可愛い https://t.co/64w84yPdfK

    18K1.3K83221.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202623x their median

    デビュー前スタシに首にあるホクロを取るように言われたけど「お母さんがプレゼントしてくれた大切な宝物(体)だから取りたくありません」って拒否したレイちゃん🥹 https://t.co/ytaDCpaVaP

    15K6381472982.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20267.8x their median

    그녀 진짜 패션 천재야 어떻게 이렇게 예쁠 수가 있지 https://t.co/PKCwhgxUWc

    4.6K8071162256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.1x their median

    キャンメイクのコスメをうるちゅるシールにしようって企画した人誰ですか…天才的な可愛さなんですが… https://t.co/R9jUSHxZon

    3.8K3932112249K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.0x their median

    セザンヌのバズり粉のブラシのとこ、ケイトの単色シャドウ2個シンデレラフィットするって投稿見かけて試したらガチだった… このパレットだけでお直し完結するやつ https://t.co/2thoJAzVIw

    1.9K194122202K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    ウォニョンコームもう買えないかと思いきや普通にロフトに置いてあった…🍒 https://t.co/LRpcckCGj8

    1.3K5705108K viewsView on X
  • Jan 18, 20261.8x their median

    スタージュエリーのギヨシェあまりの美しさに付き添いで行ったのに私も買ってしまった、、値上げ前という言葉で罪悪感薄まるのコワイ https://t.co/ZXURQ7EeyB

    1.2K65127260K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    シール沼の住民はロフトの文フェスでこのチャーム見つけたら絶対確保すべし…好きなシール入れて持ち歩けるしこのミニチュア感がたまらん https://t.co/4ZuUXyFNn1

    915700673K viewsView on X
  • May 2, 2026

    こういうメタリックなパケのコスメに惹かれがち…🤦🏻💞 https://t.co/J7FFvonUB6

    792330322K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 64K times each, and 1.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is カナ's engagement rate on X?
カナ (@K89782) has an engagement rate of 0.269%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 264,479 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.269%, カナ sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @K89782 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @K89782 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going