ZIAS DGAF engagement report
@JustZik - 389K followers on X
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 2487x its own typical post.
Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
ZIAS DGAF's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, ZIAS DGAF sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 17% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 92% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 92% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 78 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 19, 20262487x their median
Ebony REVEALS that Blueface likes his butt played with, and he retaliated by exposing her for giving him head and hooking up with Bowdean. The argument got so bad that she left the Blue Girls Club the next day š³ https://t.co/qbItaOw30L
- Aug 14, 2026350x their median
Big Meech & Steve Harvey linked up šÆ https://t.co/KDcPJ5JvmT
- Jul 20, 202629x their median
the folks on pimp my ride was so outta pocket š
- Aug 23, 20261.9x their median
WE LIVE RN GET IN HEREE https://t.co/qxmLtCUfR5 https://t.co/C8FsX7NKXU
- Jul 25, 20261.6x their median
WE LIVE RN TAP INN, Testing IRL https://t.co/ViB8IyxaLB https://t.co/8OHM7TO3eq
- Sep 2, 2026
WE LIVE RN TAP INNN https://t.co/sP5tSiNZlu https://t.co/Vq3Yy9FQpV
- Aug 7, 2026
WE LIVE RN GET IN HEREEE https://t.co/GVyjd4DPAs https://t.co/wFAHlhp978
- Sep 24, 2026
Zias & B Lou Break Down Blueface & Adrien Broner Double Or Nothing Meaning https://t.co/f1a4GnFEgX
- Jul 22, 2026
WE LIVE RN GET IN HEREEE https://t.co/HoJ22mRjvA https://t.co/4aqT9riL3N
- Sep 9, 2026
WE LIVE RN TAP INN https://t.co/NTx1Er281c
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.069% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 92% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 2487x its own typical post.
- What is ZIAS DGAF's engagement rate on X?
- ZIAS DGAF (@JustZik) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 389,442 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, ZIAS DGAF sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JustZik have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JustZik post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.