Back to @JustJenRX's profile

Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ engagement report

@JustJenRX - 242K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.134%
of 242K followers
Per impression
6.74%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
313
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.47/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 313 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.134%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 6.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 176x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #911remembrance, #america, #based.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #911remembrance, #america, #based.

Compared with accounts its own size

Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.134%, Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 277 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 2026176x their median

    Charlie Kirk had a unique gift for articulating the good β€” the goodness of family, faith, and America. One year ago today, he was killed for it. We’ll honor his legacy by building great things and holding to account the enemies of civilization. https://t.co/nYooF7xua5

    45K8.0K2.1K289705K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026150x their median

    This asshole attempted to ruin a Charlie Kirk memorial and got bear sprayed for his trouble. And he cried like a little bitch. https://t.co/q5bYmdFqc6

    40K5.0K1.4K210484K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202693x their median

    .@AGToddBlanche: "Just a few minutes ago, the DOJ filed a Judicial Misconduct Complaint with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals against all but one District Court judge in the District of Minnesota for violating various judicial canons." https://t.co/iKJm1kF8ny

    23K5.5K691262551K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202652x their median

    GRAPHIC WARNING: The full truth about Jane Doe / Cornell case y’all don’t wanna hear https://t.co/D3b0JGJprF

    14K1.3K4181871.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202629x their median

    πŸ”₯🚨 BREAKING β€” Sen. Ted Cruz just went nuclear on Jack Smith for turning a special counsel into a donor-harvesting operation. Smith’s team collected 4,782 personal checks written by ordinary Americans who gave to President Trump. Not a spreadsheet. Copies of the actual checks. They also issued 197 subpoenas aimed at 430 Republican organizations and individuals, and Cruz put the spying on GOP senators in the same pile. That is not looking for a crime. That is mapping a political network and photocopying kitchen-table donations like they were contraband. If a Democrat donor’s checkbook got pulled at that scale, the networks would still be on air. Treat this as the scandal it is. Publish the subpoena list and make Smith answer for every name.

    6.8K1.9K33797123K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202614x their median

    Text no longer retained for this post.

    3.1K1.0K17174258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    Straight βœ… White βœ… Conservative βœ… Christian βœ… Patriot πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ βœ… No penis βœ… 2-Time Trump Voter βœ… βœ… Cute af βœ… Common Sense βœ… Love Charlie Kirk Even More βœ… Pro-Life βœ… Votes Republican βœ… Full-Blooded MAGA βœ… VERY PRO 2A βœ… Hmm πŸ€” I wonder how else I can offend the left today…

    3.2K194304821K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.9x their median

    I am about to find out if my tumor grew, multiplied or not. I really want to keep my thyroid. I would be lying if I said I was not worried. https://t.co/7HOoAiQ50i

    2.5K934912035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20268.4x their median

    TIME FOR THESE ROGUE AGENTS TO GO TO PRISON!!!! https://t.co/GQpD1AIRMh

    1.8K693831813K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20267.6x their median

    Still White, Straight, & Conservative πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™€οΈ #Trump2028 https://t.co/sHEXbiVwJi

    2.1K93184314K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#911remembrance#america#based#cornell57#free

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 313 interactions against 242K followers, an engagement rate of 0.134%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 6.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 55K interactions, about 176x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #911remembrance, #america, #based.

What is Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate on X?
Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@JustJenRX) has an engagement rate of 0.134%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 242,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.134%, Just Jen β„ž πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JustJenRX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JustJenRX post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going