Back to @JurgisLiepnieks's profile

Jurģis Liepnieks engagement report

@JurgisLiepnieks - 67K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.207%
of 67K followers
Per impression
0.711%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
29.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.207%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.711% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 718 interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026. Recurring tag: #agedlikemilk.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jurģis Liepnieks's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.207%, Jurģis Liepnieks sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 390 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 14, 20265.2x their median

    Guļat? Kamēr jūs guļat, mēs maksājam trešdaļmiljonu eiro mēnesī konsultantiem par Tet/LMT darījumu, kurš visticamāk nekad nenotiks, jo nav vajadzīgs. Apsveicu visus vēža slimniekus un tos, kuri stāv rindā vai mirst rindā uz valsts apmaksātiem medicīnas pakalpojumiem. Skolotājus arī apsveicu. Visus, kam neesot naudas, - apsveicu! https://t.co/JsJWnogJUU

    50518915929K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.4x their median

    Es tagad mulstu - Siliņa/Briškena laikā AirBaltic aizņēmās par 14.5%, ko visi viennozīmīgi atzina par zārka naglu, jo nav tādu biznesu, kas pelnītu tā, lai būtu izdevīgi aizņemties par 14,5%. Tagad, pateicoties aktīvai jaunās valdības darbībai (Kulbergs esot līdz šim 30% sava laika veltījis tikai šim) Airbaltic aizņemsies par 25% 257 mio par 25% gadā???? Nopietni? Tas kā var beigties labi?

    3466449832K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.3x their median

    Pievērsīšu uzmanību - sākusies Bauskas apvedceļa iepirkuma procedūra. Liels @LVceli 300 mio projekts. Un ko mēs redzam - kartelists STRABAG, kurš aizlaidās no Latvijas uzreiz pēc KP lēmuma karteļu lietā, ir atpakaļ it kā nekas nebūtu bijis. Tagad pat nemaz netaisot vairs uzņēmumu Latvijā, bet no Polijas. Mierīgi pielaists, nekādu reputācijas risku, nekādu prob.

    3438819221K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.1x their median

    Es apzināti iepauzēju pāris dienas, domāju, jānomierinās, nevar visu laiku lamāties, bet tomēr Kulberga valdības lēmumus krievu graudu lietā es nezinu kā pieklājīgi raksturot. Tātad Latvijas valdība pieņēma lēmumu nodrošināt netraucētu tranzītu krievijas un Ukrainā zagtajiem graudiem caur Latvijas ostām. Vienīgi skatam palielinot vienu no pašām nenozīmīgākajām tranzīta izmaksu pozīcijām, kas tomēr ļaus arī Latvijai nedaudz nopelnīt šajā kopīgajā ar krieviju biznesā. Rezultātā graudu tranzīts netiks apturēts, tas iet un ies pilnā sparā, mēs palīdzam krieviem apzagt Ukrainu un iegūt naudu karam. Kā????? Tāda ir Kulberga reāla politika.

    3286130327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    Tā turpinot Kulbergs būs rekord īsā laikā panācis to, ka pēc vēlēšanām viņa kā premjera kandidatūra nebūs vairs aktuāla, pat ja AS būs uzvarētājs. Kurš politisks spēks gribēs strādāt ar tādu vadītāju?

    2784034127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.4x their median

    Vakardienas LTV debatēs (atkal jau) pārsteidza MMN. Uzturēs skolas arī ar 1 skolnieku. Pensiju otrais līmenis jāatdod tautai. Latvija jau esot pašpietiekama elektroenerģijas ziņā, neesot nekādu prob. Iespaidīgs galēja populisma un nekompetences kokteilis.

    2911928017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.4x their median

    Šonedēļ KNL Kulbergs taisnojoties, kapēc nav izdarīts nekas budžetā, citos jaut, teica, ka viņam 30% laika bijis jātērē AirBaltic glābšanai un tas toties ir izdevies. Tagad mēs uzzinam, ka šī izdošanās ietver aizņemšanos uz 25% gadā, kas vairs pat nav ātrais kredīts, bet kaut kāda kapeņu izlaupīšana. Pie tam Saeimas piešķirtā nodokļu nauda tātad tagad aizies maksājot kādiem šiem "gudrās naudas" pārstāvjiem procentus. Ceru dzirdēt šodien @AndrisKulbergs skaidrojumu par šo lielisko plānu. Glābt kompāniju, kura nevar atdot 14.5% kredītu aizdodot tai jaunu uz 25% tas izklausās tiešām interesanti.

    2554634117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.3x their median

    Izcila valdība. Simts dienas tuvojas, izdarīts nav nekas, publiski plēšas par dokumentu saskaņošanas procedūrām. “Enerģiskajam” Kulbergam daži ministri pārāk enerģiski.

    2563623218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.9x their median

    240 000 eiro – tik liela summa nepieciešama mazās Olīvijas ārstēšanas sākšanai, lai meitenīte nepaliktu paralizēta. Ģimenei šādas naudas nav, tāpēc https://t.co/df6y8tj07r lūdz ikviena atbalstu. Meitenei ir reta, ģenētiska saslimšana, un viņa ir vienīgais bērns Latvijā ar šādu diagnozi. Medikaments, kas var mazināt slimības gaitu, nav iekļauts kompensējamo zāļu sarakstā. 🖥️ https://t.co/gRFXWcbR2m

    109101272183K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Atņemiet taču kāds Kulbergam tviteri! Nav ko darba laikā ālēties! Premjeram ir jāstrādā nevis sociālajos tīklos jāpataisa sevi par muļķi.

    1562413219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#agedlikemilk

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.207%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.711% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 718 interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Jurģis Liepnieks's engagement rate on X?
Jurģis Liepnieks (@JurgisLiepnieks) has an engagement rate of 0.207%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,758 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.207%, Jurģis Liepnieks sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JurgisLiepnieks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JurgisLiepnieks post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going