Back to @JulieXKay's profile

Julie engagement report

@JulieXKay - 165K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 165K followers
Per impression
0.354%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
7.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
43
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.354% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 1366x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julie's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, Julie sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 2, 20261366x their median

    Latasha HarlinsπŸ•ŠοΈ πŸ•ŠοΈ (Jan 1, 1976 – Mar 16, 1991) Cyrus Carmack Belton πŸ•ŠοΈπŸ•ŠοΈ (Feb 6, 2009 - May 28, 2023) https://t.co/p8cBFlTATb

    46K13K2162542.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026467x their median

    I wanted to be thick so bad and now I got a lil gut, bye.

    14K4.6K1161.1K791K viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 2022148x their median

    π•Žπ• π•£π•€π•™π•šπ•‘ π•žπ•– πŸ™πŸ½ https://t.co/Vkg3LkZqCF

    5.9K4116532View on X
  • Aug 16, 202673x their median

    If you don’t wanna subscribe you can buy this full video directly πŸ˜› dm me to purchase https://t.co/edt34Rl7Cs

    3.0K18420149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202639x their median

    New posts on my Onlyfans ! πŸ˜› https://t.co/hcE9lXDzy9

    1.6K6514222K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202629x their median

    New full length 10 min solo available watch right now on my onlyfans!!! Make sure you’re subscribed! https://t.co/UYwMN4Wzr6 https://t.co/R2g9wY2sc1

    1.2K479024K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202629x their median

    One on one bookings available in Miami ! I’ll also take them in Fort Lauderdale and surrounding areas 🀭 dm me or email to book [email protected] https://t.co/sHbghRlzKD

    1.2K6115344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202619x their median

    Making content today ! If you want a custom video half off dm to purchase πŸ˜› https://t.co/QydaYDXqmQ

    807233013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202617x their median

    Feeling generous πŸ˜› half off custom videos. Premade content. Personal number half off ! Custom pictures like this and dick rates ! Also personal bookings are always available in Miami and surrounding area πŸ†πŸ’¦πŸ“± https://t.co/6hy7ndzy95

    72422409.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202615x their median

    One on one bookings available in Miami and Fort Lauderdale! Dm or email [email protected] to schedule yours ! https://t.co/DAzO611tkJ

    621237113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 43 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.354% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 59K interactions, about 1366x its own typical post.

What is Julie's engagement rate on X?
Julie (@JulieXKay) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 164,763 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, Julie sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JulieXKay have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JulieXKay post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going