Back to @JulianRoepcke's profile

Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦 engagement report

@JulianRoepcke - 190K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.36%
of 190K followers
Per impression
3.36%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
680
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.87/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 680 interactions against 190K followers, an engagement rate of 0.36%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #frontline, #afd, #bsw.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tags: #frontline, #afd, #bsw.

Compared with accounts its own size

Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.36%, Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 324 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 10, 202616x their median

    Russland liefert dem Iran Daten, um US-amerikanische Basen zu attackieren. Dafür entziehen die USA der Ukraine Daten, um russische Basen zu attackieren. Ergibt eigentlich nur dann Sinn, wenn der Anführer der USA auf Seiten Russlands steht.

    9.2K1.6K1442772K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202615x their median

    Durch nichts zu entschuldigen, niemals zu verzeihen – drei Zivilisten wurden gestern Abend getötet und 20 verletzt, als eine russische Rakete gezielt ein Wohngebiet in Charkiw angriff. 🚨Verstörende Aufnahmen, die #AfD, #BSW und #Linke durch ein Ende der deutschen Hilfe an die Ukraine zum Alltag machen wollen.

    8.9K1.0K17628287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    Donald Trump verbietet der Ukraine, weiter russische Raffinerien anzugreifen. Das bislang effektivste Verteidigungsmittel der Ukraine. Er behauptet, Russlands fehlender Diesel treibe den Marktpreis international hoch. Fakt ist aber, dass 2025 lediglich 11% des weltweit seegängig gehandelten Diesels aus Russland kamen. 22 % kamen dagegen aus der Golfregion, die Trump mit seinem inkompetent vorangetriebenen und faktisch gegen den Iran verlorenen Krieg zum erliegen gebracht hat. Die Ukraine dient dem Mann demnach lediglich als Sündenbock für sein eigenes Versagen auf ganzer Strecke. https://t.co/jWdgkGOxuh

    6.0K1.3K33446145K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20268.6x their median

    ☠️24 Zivilisten, darunter fünf Kinder, hat Russland heute in der Ukraine ermordet. Weitere 110 Unschuldige verletzt. 💙Alles, was @UlrichSiegmund dazu einfällt, ist, der Ukraine keine weiteren Verteidigungswaffen mehr zu liefern. 👺In diesen Menschen wütet die pure Bosheit. https://t.co/0NejELLR9A

    4.5K1.1K2762751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20267.8x their median

    Unfassbar. Russland attackiert jetzt Zivilisten direkt an der Grenze, die ein paar Tage dem Krieg entfliehen wollten. Dieses Drecksregime nimmt ein ganzes Volk als Geisel und tötet einen nach dem anderen. Die Szenen spielen sich 6 km vom NATO-Luftraum entfernt ab. https://t.co/GPaVZBIGPy

    3.7K1.0K5653387K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20267.3x their median

    Es gibt noch nicht mal eine neue Regierung, kein einziges Problem des Bundeslandes wurde angegangen, aber die neuen Herrscher wollen als aller erstes Russlands Interessen in Deutschland umsetzen. Egal, warum die Menschen diese Parteien wählen – DAS ist ihr primärer Daseinsgrund. https://t.co/555Coswx8G

    3.7K7894103789K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20267.2x their median

    Natalia und ihre Tochter Polina (15) sind zwei von 23 von Russland in einem Wohnhaus ermordeten Zivilisten, die Opfer eines gezielten russischen Angriffs auf Saporischschja mit einer gelenkten Gleitbombe wurden. ➡️Sie hielten sich bis zuletzt an den Händen, gerettet hat es sie nicht. ➡️AfD, BSW und Linke wollen der ukrainischen Armee die Mittel nehmen, sich gegen solche Kriegsverbrechen zu verteidigen. ➡️Moralisch sind diese Parteien am Ende. Sicherheitspolitisch übrigens auch.

    3.6K1.2K782641K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20266.6x their median

    #EIL Russisches Massaker in #Kramatorsk. Das Drecksregime hat zwei voll besetzte Busse mit einer Lenkbombe angegriffen. Nach aktuellem Stand gibt es 30 Tote und 18 Verletzte. DAS ist es, was #AfD, #BSW und #Linke mit ihrer Verweigerung von Verteidigungswaffen aktiv befeuern! https://t.co/4G7qmRSmmg

    3.2K1.1K1496649K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.6x their median

    Das Perverse ist ja: Je schlimmer der russische Vernichtungskrieg, je mehr er sich gegen Zivilisten richtet und je deutlicher die ganze Welt merkt, dass Russland die Ukraine militärisch nicht besiegen kann – desto aggressiver arbeitet die fünfte Kolonne des Kreml in Deutschland für das in allen Belangen gescheiterte Moskauer Regime. Moral, Mitgefühl oder auch nur Gnade kennen diese Menschen nicht.

    3.1K5761391136K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20265.3x their median

    Russland: „Wir greifen keine zivilen Objekte an.“🤥 Unterdessen auf einem Spielplatz in Kyjiw.⤵️ https://t.co/GCqA6QN2BY

    2.6K7651473262K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#frontline#afd#bsw#linke#analyse

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 680 interactions against 190K followers, an engagement rate of 0.36%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #frontline, #afd, #bsw.

What is Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦's engagement rate on X?
Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦 (@JulianRoepcke) has an engagement rate of 0.36%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 189,862 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.36%, Julian Röpcke 🇩🇪🤝🇺🇦 sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JulianRoepcke have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JulianRoepcke post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going