Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™ engagement report
@JujuliaGrace - 238K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 428 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 5.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™'s engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.179%, Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 65% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 68% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 198 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 20269.0x their median
Over the moon - August Tessa Patterson is here 🥰 https://t.co/ejGQVZX0n0 https://t.co/PVSw3nQnWW
- Sep 5, 20267.4x their median
I’m so fed up of reading mock shock pieces in the right-wing media about how much the NHS costs to run. I’ve never seen a single piece examining what proportion of NHS funding is siphoned off into private companies seeking to make a profit. If they’re so concerned…
- Sep 5, 20267.2x their median
The only people who benefit from NHS privatisation are the private company shareholders. It’s that simple.
- Sep 16, 20266.8x their median
Ed Sheeran needs to learn that if you don’t “pick a side”, you’re picking the side of the oppressor. Every single time. It’s that simple.
- Sep 11, 20266.8x their median
Given that Reform are so obsessed with pubs, every single pub should put an RNLI collection box on the bar.
- Sep 18, 20265.3x their median
This doesn’t surprise me at all. Which is pretty terrible, when you think about it 🚨 Article link: https://t.co/3MtfH3I2Wf https://t.co/ApTVXvlHq1 https://t.co/mwyHMxOi7p
- Jul 17, 20265.0x their median
On the £10 billion wasted PPE (I founded and built the org of doctors that took the Tories to court and proved the existence of the VIP PPE lane along with Good Law Project)… https://t.co/DTl20wqnTR
- Sep 12, 20264.9x their median
We need to wake up to what’s going on 🚨 https://t.co/ApTVXvlHq1 https://t.co/0AXWFbaHYc
- Sep 14, 20263.0x their median
Any journalists clutching pearls about these Reform crypto billionaire donations need to look in the mirror. Why has Reform got to this place? Because they’ve been relentlessly platformed for years. Legacy media outlets need to take responsibility- they’re part of the problem.
- Sep 17, 20262.9x their median
Right, I’m just going to say it. I’m fed up of seeing the Lib Dems talk about the need to support the NHS and stop corridor care, when they don’t actually oppose NHS privatisation 🚨 …
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 428 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.179%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 5.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.
- What is Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™'s engagement rate on X?
- Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™ (@JujuliaGrace) has an engagement rate of 0.179%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 238,132 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.179%, Dr Julia Grace Pattersonđź’™ sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JujuliaGrace have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JujuliaGrace post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.