Back to @JoyceCarolOates's profile

Joyce Carol Oates engagement report

@JoyceCarolOates - 286K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.128%
of 286K followers
Per impression
2.63%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
4.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
367
interactions (median)
Saved
0.186%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 367 interactions against 286K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Joyce Carol Oates's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.128%, Joyce Carol Oates sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 323 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202697x their median

    ⛽️ MAGA TRUCKERS: “There’s no reason for this… My truck’s gonna sit there and rot until this idiot is out of office… I never thought I’d say this but I miss Biden… we’re dying out here and they don’t give a shit…” cc: @MarshaBlackburn https://t.co/xhGePo5T5J

    24K8.8K2.3K8781.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202671x their median

    🚨 JUST IN: Hospital saline has been recalled nationwide after iron oxide and other particles were found inside. FDA warns contaminated doses could cause organ damage. https://t.co/hcgvkbCb22

    18K6.0K5491.3K1.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202671x their median

    Trump has pardoned Trevor Milton, a man convicted of stealing $695 million from investors. This pardon came after Milton donated nearly $1 million to Trump's PAC. If you are a criminal and have a bag of cash for the orange pig… you’re as good as free. https://t.co/aZMPV3mNNO

    17K7.9K441393293K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202653x their median

    Las palabras de Isabella Rossellini 🇮🇹 son una bocanada de aire fresco en una sociedad que a menudo vive obsesionada con detener el reloj. Su reflexión desarma los mitos de la eterna juventud y plantea una mirada profundamente liberadora sobre el paso del tiempo: "Soy mayor y tengo el aspecto de una mujer de mi edad. Algunas mañanas, al mirarme en el espejo, me pregunto: ‘¿Y si me opero?’. Pero siempre lo descarto, porque la cirugía es como cuando vendaban los pies a las mujeres en China, una nueva manifestación de la misoginia. Podría parecer de 56, pero cuando tuviera 76, aparentaría 66... Es ganar una batalla para perder la guerra. Además, con el tiempo, la belleza reside sobre todo en la elegancia y la inteligencia. Pienso, por ejemplo, en María Callas, Frida Kahlo, Anna Magnani... A los 20, todos somos atractivos con unos vaqueros y una camiseta, pero luego la belleza se convierte en una cuestión de estilo, personalidad y carisma. No hay que ocultar los defectos, sino transformarlos en lo que nos hace únicos. Ya no busco ser sexy, sino expresar lo mejor de mí misma. Cuando eres joven, estás bajo mucha presión: el trabajo, el dinero, los hijos... Pero a medida que envejeces, te sientes más libre, más segura, y haces lo que realmente deseas. ¡Nadie habla de lo maravilloso que es envejecer!"

    17K2.3K297160624K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202628x their median

    my soul cat passed away today. what am I supposed to do now? I’m not even sure why I’m tweeting this. I just hope someone can stop by and appreciate her for a moment. Her name is Lucy.💔 https://t.co/YghclqPF5d

    9.0K2441.0K2872K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202627x their median

    Nothing is more symbolic of trump's presidency than him literally building an arch to honor himself that blocks the view of the final resting place honoring hundreds of thousands of American who gave their lives in sacrifice for their country.

    7.7K2.0K1023053K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202626x their median

    This Bitch. MAGA Attorney General Lynn Fitch of Mississippi… Said the murder of a one year old black child by a police officer was “Justified”. Because the child’s parents were shoplifting at Walmart. The cop was Hunter Foster. A white Police Officer. Let’s reverse. If the one year old child, Was a white child belonging to a prominent white family… And the cop was black… The cop would be charged with Murder. Tell me I’m wrong.

    5.4K3.2K75315256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202626x their median

    Today I was reminded of a ritual now missing from our lives: The "visit". Boomers & gen X grew up with "going visiting". Our parents would load us in the car and we'd go visit with friends and family. The etiquette of visiting was: one cup of coffee w/ a sweet treat, then 1/2

    8.9K264182631.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202625x their median

    You know who is with Trump this weekend in New Jersey. #TravelWithNatalie (Roberto Schmidt/Getty) https://t.co/7idONuQNy9

    7.2K1.1K6461211.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/0SYGkDHJBS

    5.0K6692463739K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 367 interactions against 286K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 2.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 97x its own typical post.

What is Joyce Carol Oates's engagement rate on X?
Joyce Carol Oates (@JoyceCarolOates) has an engagement rate of 0.128%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 286,311 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.128%, Joyce Carol Oates sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JoyceCarolOates have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JoyceCarolOates post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going