Back to @Jourd4n_'s profile

Jourd4n engagement report

@Jourd4n_ - 483K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
5.36%
of 483K followers
Per impression
17.0%
153K views on a typical post
Reach
31.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
26K
interactions (median)
Saved
2.53%
3.9K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 26K interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 5.36%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 153K times each, and 17.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #thebadguys2.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jourd4n's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 5.36%, Jourd4n sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 37 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 17, 20269.7x their median

    https://t.co/CClthpyn5R

    125K5.2K178454.8M viewsView on X
  • Apr 3, 20269.3x their median

    https://t.co/o081i8Xgrl

    80K2.9K575612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.0x their median

    Coffee with vanilla https://t.co/FiACMWJfRO

    75K2.7K498406K viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 20264.7x their median

    Backrooms discovered in Gravity Falls https://t.co/pNceMrswqc

    58K4.2K5510484K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.1x their median

    https://t.co/lhNN1ChNwP

    51K3.0K5214329K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20261.9x their median

    Claire hours https://t.co/3cjYEs4yYT

    47K1.8K554291K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 20263.6x their median

    pink https://t.co/JagqaBxKuK

    46K2.0K5112329K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20261.8x their median

    Rewatched the Bad Guys2 Imma need yall to listen. https://t.co/ND3Zxg3MC6

    43K2.1K5233192.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20261.6x their median

    Dracaene's request https://t.co/8SfiRBsVH2

    39K3.4K5122377K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.6x their median

    Draco 🐍 https://t.co/m2kfhxFHuM

    38K3.3K7334348K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#thebadguys2

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 26K interactions against 483K followers, an engagement rate of 5.36%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 153K times each, and 17.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 31.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 130K interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

What is Jourd4n's engagement rate on X?
Jourd4n (@Jourd4n_) has an engagement rate of 5.36%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 483,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 5.36%, Jourd4n sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Jourd4n_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Jourd4n_ post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going