Back to @JonahLupton's profile

Jonah Lupton engagement report

@JonahLupton - 555K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 555K followers
Per impression
0.446%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
7.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
189
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 189 interactions against 555K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.446% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jonah Lupton's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Jonah Lupton sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 564 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 202621x their median

    Hate data centers all you want, until the research they enable saves someone you love.

    3.6K2557346180K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202611x their median

    Wow this is sad to see Korean markets with $SKHY / Samsung crash like this. Special thanks to $AVGO CEO adding fuel the fire… Calling AI investors gamblers and saying enterprise AI isn’t delivering ROI. https://t.co/fHzsD9Na4s

    1.8K7220022468K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20267.8x their median

    I NEED A STOCK THAT RETAIL DOESNT KNOW ABOUT ONE THAT HASNT BLOWN UP YET WHAT IS IT?!

    6192081919360K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 20267.3x their median

    This is the COMPLETE Peptide Tier List compilation — Parts 1 through 3 combined into one deep dive. We break down the most talked-about compounds in fitness, longevity, anti-aging, and fat loss: Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, Retatrutide, Mazdutide, Growth Hormone (HGH), HCG, IGF-1 LR3, Tesamorelin, Sermorelin, CJC-1295, Ipamorelin, BPC-157, TB-500, NAD+, Melanotan, Selank, SEMAX, MOTS-C, Kisspeptin, Insulin, and more. If you’ve ever searched: • Best peptides for fat loss • Best peptide for muscle growth • GLP-1 vs growth hormone • Is BPC-157 legit? • Is insulin dangerous for bodybuilding? This thread answers it. We cover: ✔️ Real human data vs hype ✔️ Fat loss vs muscle-building compounds ✔️ GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide, tirzepatide, retatrutide) ✔️ Growth hormone secretagogues ✔️ Longevity + nootropic peptides ✔️ The compounds people massively overestimate Some are revolutionary. Some are promising. Some are pure internet fantasy. This isn’t bro science. It’s mechanism + data + real-world application. If you’re considering peptides for weight loss, muscle gain, performance, anti-aging, or cognition — read this before you inject anything. 👇 Which compound surprised you the most?

    1.2K124908290K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.6x their median

    Why is everyone saying AI stocks will crash Monday. Model development slowing down a bit doesn't mean you build less data centers? You realize most companies deploying still use 6 month+ old models right? I think the market might like the Elon / Sama / Dario allignment.

    9684422116220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.3x their median

    Good chart from @TMTBreakout July accelerated both MoM and YoY for the sum of OpenAI and Anthropic. Some chance Anthropic shifted from gross to net reporting for ARR. Meaning the 65b is a more conservative metric than the $47. Smart thing to do before an IPO. Openrouter data shows that AI broadly has accelerated further over the last 3 weeks. Open source taking share is positive for AI infrastructure demand.

    9751276829201K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.5x their median

    $APP and $TTD both trade at 15x NTM EPS. $APP just grew Q2 revenues at 53% with 84% ebitda margins = 137 score $TTD just grew Q2 revenues by 3% with 34% ebitda margins = 37 score I’m speechless 😶 It’s absurd that $APP is this cheap when management said the tiny miss on Q2 revenues was from a model change and they already fixed the problem and growth has re-accelerated. PS: I talked to a sell side analyst this week that said $APP was purposely conservative with Q3 guidance so they can beat & raise. NFA. DYOR.

    4002748394K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.5x their median

    Currently on a group call with the Macquarie analyst that just initiated coverage on $CXMT I’ll post my notes in a little bit. Will say this… if you’re selling the big 3 memory companies because the financial media says $CXMT is a threat… then you’re just as dumb as the journalists spreading this FUD. $CXMT is not a threat to Micron, Samsung or SK Hynix and I’ll share why in my notes.

    39637271064K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.3x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP ADMIN PAVING WAY FOR TEMPORARY SALE OF CERTAIN PEPTIDES SOURCE: WASHINGTON POST $HIMS https://t.co/JAxKGve1dn

    37620211659K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.3x their median

    Tungsten prices rose 310% between January and July, one of the sharpest commodity rallies of the year. China produced 79% of the world's mined tungsten in 2025 and controls 85% of refining capacity, its own mined output actually fell 10% year-on-year as export controls tightened. Even if every announced project outside China succeeds, S&P Global still projects a 16,000-tonne supply gap by 2030. Prices have already cleared the cost needed to fund new mines. New projects can still take up to 16 years to reach production. Source: S&P Global (via The Oregon Group)

    303761929118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 189 interactions against 555K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.446% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Jonah Lupton's engagement rate on X?
Jonah Lupton (@JonahLupton) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 554,696 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Jonah Lupton sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JonahLupton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JonahLupton post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going