Back to @JohnFromCranber's profile

John Betts engagement report

@JohnFromCranber - 338K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 338K followers
Per impression
4.79%
84 views on a typical post
Reach
0.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 84 times each, and 4.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.025% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 595 interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Betts's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, John Betts sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 2026149x their median

    What our win last Election actually shows is how little most Americans actually cared for the Left's radical agenda: * Canceling student debt * An Open Border * Mass Islamic Immugration * Funding Ukraine * Reparations * Voting without an ID * Their Green Agenda * Late term abortions * Men in women’s sports + bathrooms * Racist DEI policies * "Wokeism" and Cancel Culture * War on Free Speech *Taking ZERO actions to reign in our National Debt - and a veritable war on DOGE findings * Illegals > American Citizens *Criminals> Law Abidibg Citizens And now they are pushing Communism and Islamism too Even the ultra-biased Media, fear mongering, Voter Fraud, and offering "free stuff" couldn't get the Left over the top last time - let's hope that happens this Fall too

    40410082935K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202699x their median

    FAKE POLLS! https://t.co/eZZ5WEIACy

    5818306124.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202645x their median

    And I don't want to hear your call to prayer! https://t.co/kcI2SFJIVM

    611510205.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202629x their median

    Why is it that we're supposed to adjust to the wishes, culture and religion of the Sharia folks rather than having the Sharia folks adjust to the wishes, culture and religion of us Westerners - after all, they're our countries? https://t.co/24XWkmpHyo

    2358362.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202619x their median

    Because we're not gay? https://t.co/1tOe9Rkv2g

    2844055.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202616x their median

    Sounds good! Wish all of Europe and American would follow suit https://t.co/vlfJObUXJG

    31201122.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202616x their median

    It's NOT "Islamophobia", it's common sense https://t.co/Pv7wZ6MlY0

    4212802.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202612x their median

    Is water wet? https://t.co/Tf3Bva1Pmo

    248142596 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202611x their median

    In your welfare checks! https://t.co/AJZjQMWha5

    913202.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20269.0x their median

    Sure as hell beats voting for a Communist https://t.co/LnquR8Ony9

    27270720 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 84 times each, and 4.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.025% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 595 interactions, about 149x its own typical post.

What is John Betts's engagement rate on X?
John Betts (@JohnFromCranber) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 337,761 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, John Betts sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JohnFromCranber have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JohnFromCranber post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going