Back to @Jim_Jordan's profile

Rep. Jim Jordan engagement report

@Jim_Jordan - 6.8M followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 6.8M followers
Per impression
2.30%
92K views on a typical post
Reach
1.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 6.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 2.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rep. Jim Jordan's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, Rep. Jim Jordan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202622x their median

    10 out of 10 ActBlue employees took the fifth.

    36K6.2K3.8K357562K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202619x their median

    Democrats don't want to stop fraud. They just want Republicans to stop investigating it.

    28K4.2K7.3K491404K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202615x their median

    It's illegal for foreigners to donate to U.S. elections. So why'd ActBlue tell its fraud prevention analysts to ignore red flags about donations with foreign indicators?

    24K3.9K4.1K277425K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202614x their median

    Fauci lied. He knew lockdowns, masks and social distancing didn't work. Now he's taking the fifth.

    22K2.2K5.5K3802.3M viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 202314x their median

    BREAKING: Our contact in Juarez, MX tells us a massive group of at least 1,000 migrants just attempted to rush a port of entry in El Paso in an effort to get into the United States. Video shows them pushing past the Mexican side of Paso Del Norte bridge. Awaiting CBP comment. https://t.co/lxriIB3TSm

    16K7.2K3.1K1.8K13M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    More than 1000 illegal aliens arrested in the suburbs of DC. Some were wanted for kidnapping, robbery, and murder. This is who sanctuary jurisdictions protect. https://t.co/dobf97UaL8

    20K4.0K65972375K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    Illegal aliens shouldn't have drivers' licenses or be able to vote. That's common sense unless you're a Democrat.

    19K1.6K1.7K122231K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202610.0x their median

    "Todd Blanche loves our country, just as he loves the Department of Justice. He has earned this promotion to be our next attorney general." https://t.co/HgIxguLWzx

    16K2.7K2.5K142287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20269.8x their median

    First, Jack Smith and his team violated the Constitution and DOJ’s own procedures to target President Trump and Republicans. Then, Jack Smith couldn’t recall basic details about his OWN investigation. Now, Jack Smith has been referred to the DOJ for lying to Congress.

    13K2.3K5.3K351379K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20269.5x their median

    Non-citizens and illegal aliens have been caught registering to vote and voting thousands of times. But the Left keeps saying this never happens.

    13K2.1K4.6K224222K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 6.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 2.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Rep. Jim Jordan's engagement rate on X?
Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,828,021 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, Rep. Jim Jordan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Jim_Jordan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Jim_Jordan post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going