Jim Ferguson engagement report
@JimFergusonUK - 445K followers on X
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 267 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #romanian.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jim Ferguson's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.06%, Jim Ferguson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 76% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 29% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 875 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 202638x their median
Romanian people have reached their limit. Globalists canceled our elections, banned our candidate, then rigged the next ones. Now their puppets are wrecking the economy while propping up Kyiv’s mafia regime. https://t.co/WL1b82kmBR
- Sep 18, 202635x their median
Chaos in Ceuta last night as illegal migrants were being moved from one camp to another. The Spanish government lied when it said in early August that practically all of the migrants had returned to Morocco. There are still thousands and thousands left. https://t.co/ZNo0LPPg5v
- Sep 19, 202623x their median
A powerful speech by Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya 🇯🇵 Japan and Europe face the same historic demographic challenge: falling birth rates, ageing populations and shrinking younger generations. Mass immigration is not the only possible answer to demographic decline. The deeper challenge is to build societies where families can flourish, young people can afford to have children, and nations can confidently pass their heritage, culture and traditions to the next generation. Japan and Europe have much to learn from each other. Our demographic future deserves serious debate. 🇯🇵🤝🇪🇺 #Sanseito #SoheiKamiya #Japan #Europe #Demographics #Family
- Sep 21, 202613x their median
We will NOT VOTE for the Siegfried Mureșan’ government despite all the pressure! The establishment will not bring us down. We have left the plenary session and we will continue TO STAND WITH Călin Georgescu 🇷🇴 against all the attacks he is facing! STOP THE POLITICAL POLICE! https://t.co/QixPQvGWEB
- Sep 19, 202611x their median
🚨 MI5 ADMITS EVIDENCE GIVEN TO THREE COURTS WAS BASED ON LIES This is an extraordinary development. MI5 has now accepted in the High Court that evidence provided to three separate courts in the case involving one of its informants was based on lies. One senior officer has resigned. Another has been suspended and could face dismissal. And judges are now considering whether contempt proceedings should follow. Whatever your view of Britain's intelligence services, there is a fundamental principle at stake here: If evidence presented to our courts cannot be trusted, who is accountable? The security services necessarily operate behind a wall of secrecy. But secrecy cannot mean immunity from scrutiny when the integrity of evidence placed before British judges is called into question. This deserves answers. I am looking further into the case.
- Aug 22, 202611x their median
🚨🇩🇪“THIS ELECTION INTERFERENCE IS GOING TO BLOW UP.” German MEP Peter Bystron issues an extraordinary warning from inside the European Parliament. ROMANIA. SLOVAKIA. THE NETHERLANDS. FRANCE. GERMANY. Allegations of political interference are now reaching across Europe. And this is no longer a question that can simply be dismissed as politicians complaining about election results. A US congressional investigation has raised serious questions about European censorship, political speech and interference surrounding democratic processes. So I went directly into the European Parliament to investigate. The question at the heart of this investigation is simple: ARE EUROPEAN INSTITUTIONS PROTECTING DEMOCRACY — OR INCREASINGLY SHAPING THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH EUROPEANS ARE ALLOWED TO CHOOSE THEIR GOVERNMENTS? These are serious allegations. They require serious evidence. And that is exactly what I went looking for. Watch what Peter Bystron told me inside the European Parliament. This investigation goes much deeper. @PetrBystronAfD
- Aug 21, 20268.1x their median
🚨🇨🇦IS FOOD BECOMING ANOTHER TOOL OF CONTROL? Ted Kuntz raises an uncomfortable question about what is happening to farming and food production in Canada. After three days of hearings examining the issue, he says one phrase kept coming back: “NONE OF THIS MAKES SENSE.” Not from the perspective of farmers. Not from the perspective of food production. Not from the perspective of health. So Kuntz asks the next question: If these policies don't make sense on their stated objectives, what is actually driving them? He believes that when the various developments are considered together, they point towards something much bigger — reducing our reliance on naturally produced food and protein while moving towards increasingly industrialised and lab-produced alternatives. That is his conclusion, and it deserves to be tested against the evidence. But the underlying question is enormously important. Food isn't simply another commodity. WHOEVER CONTROLS THE FOOD SUPPLY HOLDS EXTRAORDINARY POWER OVER THE POPULATION. If independent farmers disappear...If production becomes concentrated into fewer hands...If governments increasingly determine what can be produced, how it can be produced and ultimately what reaches our plates...Then food security becomes a question of national sovereignty and individual freedom. We have spent decades surrendering control of essential systems to increasingly concentrated interests. We should think very carefully before doing the same thing with the one thing none of us can live without. Ted Kuntz explains what their Canadian hearings uncovered — and why he believes we need to start connecting the dots. Watch this. @Inquiry_Canada
- Oct 14, 20257.3x their median
A Global Awakening Begins in Dubrovnik As a Scottish Highlander with Viking blood, I was born to fight. I stood among warriors. Patriots from across the world gathered in Dubrovnik with one purpose: to defend our nations, our families, and our freedom. The Make Europe Great Again conference was more than an event — it was a rallying cry. A stand against the rising tide of globalism that seeks to control, to silence, and to erase identity itself. But we made it clear: we will not bow, we will not comply, and we will not be silenced. In my speech, I spoke about the legacy of Charlie Kirk — a man who changed the battlefield. He didn’t wait for permission; he took action. He inspired a generation to rise, to think critically, and to speak truth when it was dangerous to do so. That same fire burns in patriots across Europe, America, and beyond. United by conviction, courage, and faith — we are building something unstoppable. This is more than a movement. It is a mission. A global awakening. We will stand. We will build. And we will lead. @MEGAconferences @georgesimion @_AdvanceUK
- Aug 21, 20267.3x their median
🚨🇺🇦NORD STREAM: THE STORY IS UNRAVELLING Four years after explosions ripped through the Nord Stream pipelines beneath the Baltic Sea, another Ukrainian suspect has reportedly been arrested in connection with the sabotage. And what German investigators are now alleging deserves serious attention. The man arrested in Croatia is alleged to have been one of the trained divers who planted explosives on the pipelines near Bornholm. He is not the only suspect. Another Ukrainian, Serhii K., is already in German proceedings, accused of helping coordinate the operation. But here's where this becomes much bigger than a group of rogue divers. German judicial material says Serhii K. was an officer in a special unit of the Ukrainian armed forces and found it “highly probable” that the alleged sabotage team was acting on behalf of a foreign state. Read that again. “HIGHLY PROBABLE” THEY WERE ACTING ON BEHALF OF A FOREIGN STATE. That does not establish that President Zelensky ordered the attack. It does not yet establish the precise chain of command. And Ukraine has denied state responsibility. But compare where the investigation stands today with what Europeans knew publicly in September 2022. Nord Stream — critical European energy infrastructure — was blown apart. NATO confirmed it was deliberate sabotage, but said attribution remained unresolved. The EU condemned the deliberate destruction of European energy infrastructure without identifying the perpetrator. Now German investigators are pursuing alleged Ukrainian participants, and German judicial findings have raised the possibility of state involvement. There is another extraordinary part of this story. When Poland previously arrested the Ukrainian diver now detained in Croatia, a Polish court refused to extradite him to Germany. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk subsequently made his own position unmistakably clear: “The problem with Nord Stream 2 is not that it was blown up. The problem is that it was built.” So perhaps the biggest question is no longer simply: WHO BLEW UP NORD STREAM? It is: WHAT DID WESTERN GOVERNMENTS KNOW — AND WHEN DID THEY KNOW IT? Were Western intelligence agencies aware of plans to attack the pipelines before the explosions? When did Germany first receive information pointing towards Ukrainian actors? What did Washington know? What did Poland know? And if investigators ultimately establish that people acting on behalf of a NATO-backed state destroyed critical European energy infrastructure, what are the political consequences? I'm now going back through the judicial record, intelligence warnings and government statements from 2022 onwards. Because four years later, the evidentiary picture surrounding one of the most consequential acts of infrastructure sabotage in modern European history looks very different. THIS INVESTIGATION IS FAR FROM OVER.
- Sep 7, 20266.9x their median
🚨🇬🇧 STOP BLAMING THE PEOPLE SMUGGLERS. WHO IS ACTUALLY IN CHARGE OF BRITAIN’S BORDER? Around 140 migrants have now been brought ashore at Portsmouth after crossing from France. And once again we are being told about the criminal gangs. Of course the smugglers are criminals. But smugglers do not write British immigration law. Smugglers do not control Border Force. Smugglers do not decide what happens when a boat enters British waters. Smugglers do not determine asylum policy, deportation policy, enforcement priorities or Britain’s relationship with France. Government does. So perhaps we should stop pretending this is simply something being done to Britain by criminal gangs. The much harder question is this: WHY HAVE SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS ALLOWED A SYSTEM TO DEVELOP IN WHICH THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE CAN ENTER THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND THEN BE PROCESSED, housed and absorbed into the asylum system? If ministers believe they genuinely cannot stop it, they should explain why. If the law prevents them, change the law. If international agreements prevent them, tell the British public exactly which agreements. If France is failing to stop departures, explain what Britain is doing about it. But stop hiding behind the smugglers. THE SMUGGLERS ARE NOT THE GOVERNMENT. The British Government is responsible for Britain’s borders. Portsmouth is not merely another small-boats story. It raises a much bigger question: IS THIS REALLY A BORDER CRISIS THE GOVERNMENT CANNOT STOP — OR A POLICY FAILURE IT HAS CHOSEN TO LIVE WITH? The British public deserves an answer. https://t.co/71SikCjg8b
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 267 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.
- What is Jim Ferguson's engagement rate on X?
- Jim Ferguson (@JimFergusonUK) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 444,631 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.06%, Jim Ferguson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JimFergusonUK have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JimFergusonUK post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.2 posts per day across the measured window.