Jillian Michaels engagement report
@JillianMichaels - 1.7M followers on X
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 416 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 289K interactions, about 694x its own typical post.
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jillian Michaels's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.024%, Jillian Michaels sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 98% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 48% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 48% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 613 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 3, 2020694x their median
Hannity. Rush. Dobbs. Ingraham. Pirro. Nunes. Tammy. Geraldo. Doocy. Hegseth. Schlapp. Siegel. Watters. Dr. Drew. Henry. Ainsley. Gaetz. Inhofe. Pence. Kudlow. Conway. Trump. Today, we salute the Heroes of the Pandumbic. https://t.co/35WLDgoHcf
- Aug 2, 2026109x their median
Scott Galloway is a perfect example of perhaps the most pernicious people in society: the stupid-smart person. Educated beyond his intelligence. Smart enough vocabulary to justify his ego and smugness, but too stupid to understand basic realities of communists. Smart people internalize history and make good decisions. They also know the dangers of hubris. Stupid people don't know enough to even opine on the issues in the first place, so their stupidity isn't a threat. But the stupid-smart person can teach at NYU, he can build a big successful business, he can even give a good TED Talk, but he's not smart enough to see the limits of his own capacities...so he asserts himself in society with an outsized level of confidence. Sadly, he's articulate enough to fool lots of people into elevating his stupid ideas...and that's the problem. People listen to the stupid-smart guys, like him. Then they're genuinely baffled when there's a Kalashnikov pointed at their head as they're staring at a cinder block wall behind the politburo headquarters. In a functional society, this clown would be a pariah. I have precisely zero empathy for his plight in NYC. He endorsed it. Now he can eat it, good and hard.
- Sep 7, 202676x their median
This conversation is playing out in homes across the nation. https://t.co/dAcNSvEK7u
- Oct 21, 202675x their median
An 88-year-old widow lives in a trailer with no computer. Federal records say she gave nearly $150,000 to Democrats in almost 15,000 donations: eight a day, every day, for five years. Her answer? “Hell no.” One reporter knocked on her door with the paperwork, and her reaction says everything. But somewhere out there, those donations carry her name, and she says she never saw a dime of it. So whose hands made them? Nobody has a straight answer, and this clip is only the first thread. Watch to the end, then tell me I’m wrong. WATCH FULL EPISODE BELOW!!! https://t.co/KKLSb3CyXL
- Sep 2, 202650x their median
🚨 SHOCKING: Arrogant British TV host tried to humiliate an American woman for criticizing Sharia law. He immediately regretted it. She calmly listed the facts: Sharia law legalizes child marriage, forced marriage, wife-beating, polygamy, honor killings, and stoning women to death. The host had no answer. This is the reality of Sharia law!
- Aug 9, 202650x their median
This is unbelievable. I thought it was AI. Abdul El-Sayed advocates for sharia law in the U.S. He argues that the U.S. banned sharia because of hate and discrimination, and the forces that banned it are the same forces that committed [insert every historic evil]. This is obscene political propaganda, putting sharia law in the same category of victimhood as historic American tragedies. It’s a perfect example of how illiberal movements use liberal politics as a Trojan horse to smuggle in authoritarianism. But you are right about one thing, Abdul. You don’t know what it means. Iranians do, and their message is clear: Fuck you, and fuck your sharia law.
- Sep 10, 202648x their median
Seeing everyone’s feeds filled with photos of Charlie today is incredible, and honestly, as it should be. The impact he had on so many lives deserves every single tribute. For me, the photo I hold closest to my heart isn’t one of the two of us. It’s a shot of Charlie with my thirteen-year-old son. Whenever I look at it, I think about the impression he left on a young boy finding his way in life. Charlie didn’t just talk about character and kindness; he lived it, and he made sure the next generation felt its weight. In a world that only seems to get crazier, louder, and crueler by the day, a man of his decency, humor, and integrity is missed more than words can really capture. Sending all my love, strength, and prayers to his family today, and keeping Charlie close in my thoughts and heart. We feel your absence down here, Charlie, but the lessons you left behind aren't going anywhere.
- Aug 5, 202647x their median
Hollywood just got exposed in a way no one saw coming. When Anne Hathaway took the stage to preach about systemic privilege, she probably didn't expect a viral breakdown to instantly dismantle her entire speech line by line. Watching elite celebrities virtue signal from luxury podiums has officially reached its boiling point, but what happens when someone finally holds up a mirror to the hypocrisy will leave you completely speechless.
- Oct 19, 202643x their median
This woman has taken her socials down. Despite the fact that she told me to kill myself and wished death upon me, I don't want anyone saying those things to her. And notably, none of us did. None of us said anything to her at all. I'd only like for her to reflect on this sort of public behavior as obviously not ok. But I doubt that is happening. Whatever inundation on her socials she received will only serve to radicalize her more and make her feel more justified in her viciousness. She believes she is righteous and "doing the work" of social justice.
- Aug 16, 202641x their median
Are these people Really this insane? https://t.co/qECOCWGB3d
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 416 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.87% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 289K interactions, about 694x its own typical post.
- What is Jillian Michaels's engagement rate on X?
- Jillian Michaels (@JillianMichaels) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,705,003 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.024%, Jillian Michaels sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JillianMichaels have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JillianMichaels post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.2 posts per day across the measured window.