Back to @Jesus_ZambranoG's profile

Jesús Zambrano engagement report

@Jesus_ZambranoG - 145K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 145K followers
Per impression
1.92%
858 views on a typical post
Reach
0.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 858 times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.593% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jesús Zambrano's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Jesús Zambrano sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 250 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 4, 20264.8x their median

    El anuncio presidencial de regular a los medios de comunicación con el pretexto de “proteger a las audiencias” representa un nuevo paso en la configuración de un régimen  autoritario, que apesta a dictadura.   De ello hablo en @Quadratin_ https://t.co/HcUFgS6rIs

    1458401.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.3x their median

    Las mentiras que a diario se lanzan desde el púlpito presidencial ya no alcanzan para cubrir la corrupción, ineptitud y violencia. Por ello, cual régimen dictatorial, quieren su “Miniver” orwelliano y censuraron al PRI. Es inadmisible. De ello escribo en @Siempre_revista https://t.co/B4QrhGUfN7

    844101.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.3x their median

    Con su postura ante la eliminación de las elecciones en Nicaragua -que no fue la voluntad de un pueblo, sino la de un déspota- Sheinbaum da su respaldo a la dictadura de Daniel Ortega    De ello les hablo en @Quadratin_   https://t.co/keFOzN2y2G

    143521866 viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.1x their median

    El caso de “Andy” representa un duro golpe contra el obradorismo, en donde apuestan a seguir protegiendo a los suyos mientras continúan persiguiendo adversarios y se disponen a mantenerse en el poder cueste lo que cueste. De ello les hablo en @Quadratin_ https://t.co/efgs409gAG

    1040001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.0x their median

    La solución a los problemas de México no es la antagonización entre oposiciones, sino la confluencia tanto de la sociedad civil en su amplitud y pluralidad, como de las organizaciones y los partidos opositores, de izquierdas y derechas. Al respecto escribo en @Siempre_revista https://t.co/AxalBgXglD

    74100719 viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.9x their median

    “Unidad nacional sí, contra el narcosistema”   El régimen quiere retener estados en donde va en declive en las encuestas; pudiera lograrlo si la oposición va dividida. ¡Por ello se requiere que se logre la unidad de las oposiciones!   Al respecto, les hablo en @Siempre_revista https://t.co/f9J9u5hYh8

    271910896 viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.8x their median

    Como señalan  el IETD y prestigiados juristas, lo que estamos viendo a diario en México es la acumulación de amenazas contra nuestras libertades, “la construcción metódica, gradual y jurídicamente sofisticada de un régimen autoritario”. Sobre ello escribo en @Siempre_revista https://t.co/LaqHhOOrqT

    34200733 viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.7x their median

    Les comparto “Urge reconstruir el andamiaje democrático”, mi artículo en @Quadratin_ en donde hablo del posicionamiento del @IETD_MX sobre la necesidad de sumar esfuerzos para reconstruir los mecanismos democráticos sin desatender lo social https://t.co/3lMBHeiOd9

    34000594 viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.1x their median

    ¡Pero ninguna atención a la reiterada acusación que Grecia ha hecho contra Leonel Godoy y Raúl Morón sobre su posible autoría intelectual en el asesinato! ¡Es una miseria gubernamental ante el temor de perder las elecciones del 2027! (2/2)

    1417301.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.0x their median

    En el caso de Ernesto Ruffo, la autoridad actúa con diligencia. En cambio, exonera sin investigar a  los gobernantes y militantes de Morena. De ello hablo en “Ruffo y el Estado policiaco”, mi colaboración en @Quadratin_ https://t.co/MQVgGAC6HU

    92111790 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 858 times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.593% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 76 interactions, about 4.8x its own typical post.

What is Jesús Zambrano's engagement rate on X?
Jesús Zambrano (@Jesus_ZambranoG) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,574 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Jesús Zambrano sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Jesus_ZambranoG have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Jesus_ZambranoG post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going