Back to @JerzyBuzek's profile

Jerzy Buzek engagement report

@JerzyBuzek - 255K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 255K followers
Per impression
0.389%
1.7K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.389% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.656% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 989x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brussels, #ke, #pkee. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #brussels, #ke, #pkee.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Jerzy Buzek sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 578 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 30, 2025989x their median

    Kochane i Kochani!📿 W niedzielę niech wygra cała Polska! #PolskaCałaNaRafała #ŚląskMuremzaRafałem #GłosujęwDrugiejTurze #TrzaskTak #ToProste #Trzaskowski2025 https://t.co/7ziUFKx1IT

    4.7K8773382776K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 2025352x their median

    Mili Państwo, to jest polska przekładnia do turbiny wiatrowej. Robi je Famur, który od pewnego czasu koncentruje się na energetyce wiatrowej dążąc do kompleksowego wejścia w łańcuch dostaw w tych technologiach. Mówiąc krótko: Polska chce budować własne turbiny wiatrowe. Już teraz mamy spółki, które dostarczają np. kable dla wiatraków (Tele-Fonika Kable), badają dno morskie pod budowę turbin offshore (MEWO, Orlen Petrobaltic i Geofizyka Toruń) czy wykonują prace instalacyjne, montażowe itp. Więc jak ktoś twierdzi, że te wiatraki to tylko zysk dla zagranicy, to nie wie, o czym mówi. A gigantyczną naszą stratą jest to, że dopiero teraz rozwijamy szerzej ten segment w gospodarce. Bo mogliśmy być już teraz poważnym graczem.

    1.7K17521412107K viewsView on X
  • Jan 26, 2026147x their median

    Komisja Europejska pozytywnie oceniła plany inwestycji Polski w obronność. Polska będzie największym beneficjentem programu SAFE – ponad 43 mld euro. Przedstawione przez rząd projekty, największe w całej UE, spotkały się z uznaniem Komisji. 🇵🇱🇪🇺 https://t.co/ZXV1PnN6m1

    65716061517K viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 202610x their median

    We're putting an end to the EU's energy dependance on Russia. Today marks the next step, with the publication of the #REPowerEU gas regulation, which phases out EU imports of Russian gas by 2027. Learn more ➡️ https://t.co/WkliOyEN59 https://t.co/0lR3rEyzVT

    3818147.9K viewsView on X
  • Mar 24, 20267.7x their median

    ICEYE to europejska technologia w najlepszym wydaniu 🇫🇮🇵🇱🇪🇺 Jej założycielem i CEO jest Rafał Modrzewski @iceye_global Dzięki takim firmom budujemy europejskie zdolności kosmiczne – dla bezpieczeństwa, odporności i suwerenności 🇪🇺 https://t.co/qcot9zA3WC

    413027.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20263.0x their median

    O drodze Polski do #UE, ale i o tym, że musimy - jako Europejczycy - nauczyć się żyć w świecie, w którym nie odróżnia się kraju bestialsko napadniętego od barbarzyńskiego najeźdźcy, mówiłem w #SzczytEuropy⤵️ Dziękuję @bplomecka @sokoIowski za zaproszenie! https://t.co/hwaQeBwmTi

    135002.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20252.0x their median

    W najnowszym odcinku podcastu "Rzecz w tym" @rzeczpospolita rozmawiam z Bogusławem Chrabotą m. in. o nowej ofensywie populistów, rosnących w #UE napięciach wokół migracji, #Polexit i zagrożeniach dla idei zjednoczonej Europy - zapraszam do wysłuchania!⤵️ https://t.co/06eT0t70oR

    102001.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Polska ofensywa ws. ETS w Brukseli @PR24_pl https://t.co/pKmYVX61O7

    51012.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    📰 PKEE Regulatory Monitoring | 24–30 August 2026 Preparations for PKEE Energy Day 2026, the upcoming post-2030 EU energy and climate framework, new fiscal flexibility for energy investments and discussions on Europe's energy security shaped the regulatory agenda over the past week. In this edition, you can read about: ⚡ PKEE Energy Day 2026, taking place in Brussels on 9 September, 🇪🇺 the key EU energy and climate files to watch this autumn, 💶 the European Commission's new fiscal flexibility rules for energy investments, 💻 the debate over the role of nuclear energy in the EU sustainability label for data centres, 🛡️ growing attention to the resilience of Europe's energy infrastructure, 🏭 the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) and its implications for industrial decarbonisation, 💰 negotiations on the 2028–2034 EU budget and their potential impact on the energy transition. Read the full overview below. ⬇️ #energy #EUETS #EU #energytransition #decarbonisation #energypolicy #regulation #PKEE #climatepolicy #energymarket #electricity #energysecurity #nuclear #competitiveness

    22111.3K viewsView on X
  • Dec 9, 2025

    RT @_PKEE_: 📣Komentarz PKEE dot. porozumienie ws. Pakietu Omnibus I: ważny krok w kierunku ograniczenia biurokracji i uproszczeń sprawozdaw…

    0100101 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brussels#ke#pkee#soteu

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.389% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.656% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.9K interactions, about 989x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brussels, #ke, #pkee. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Jerzy Buzek's engagement rate on X?
Jerzy Buzek (@JerzyBuzek) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 255,041 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Jerzy Buzek sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JerzyBuzek have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @JerzyBuzek post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going