PlayerSells
Back to @JeremyBieber's profile

Jeremy Bieber engagement report

@JeremyBieber - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.001%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
0.27%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.318% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 2670x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #criticalminerals, #mining. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #criticalminerals, #mining.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Jeremy Bieber sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.007%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link50% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 29, 20262670x their median

    https://t.co/3TdUhfEw41

    36K3.4K8651461.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2024622x their median

    Papa

    7.6K550569588538K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 2018583x their median

    Family isn’t an important thing, it’s everything!

    6.5K1.6K479109View on X
  • Jan 9, 2025339x their median

    BREAKING: Pierre Poilievre (@PierrePoilievre) wants Elon Musk to open a @Tesla factory in Canada 🇨🇦 "It would be nice if we could convince Mr. Musk to open some of his factories here in Canada...I think that would be fantastic." What do you say @elonmusk? https://t.co/v0FzZM9XHP

    4.0K42654999351K viewsView on X
  • Jan 25, 202615x their median

    https://t.co/XfjfHNRk0k

    204109794K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 202611x their median

    Your identity and your AI agent should be yours, not a double agent for a platform. Open source is the right way to build that trust. Abaxx 🇨🇦 Agents++

    119369442K viewsView on X
  • May 1, 20269.6x their median

    Meet Agents++ Our first open-source release to develop the next generation of technology that will build smarter markets. Agents are moving from tools to actors, initiating and coordinating actions across systems as delegated extensions of users and institutions. https://t.co/Vb6Kg5RuVw

    1042956117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20249.1x their median

    Life https://t.co/y8abpOkwO8

    10371412131K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20245.9x their median

    Miss the 80s

    567251117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20255.6x their median

    This changes everything!

    7671078K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#criticalminerals#mining

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.318% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 2670x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #criticalminerals, #mining. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Jeremy Bieber's engagement rate on X?
Jeremy Bieber (@JeremyBieber) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,742,463 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Jeremy Bieber sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JeremyBieber have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @JeremyBieber post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going