Back to @JenniferJJacobs's profile

Jennifer Jacobs engagement report

@JenniferJJacobs - 364K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 364K followers
Per impression
0.411%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.7/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 364K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.411% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 833 interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #flydubai.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #flydubai.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jennifer Jacobs's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Jennifer Jacobs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 388 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202612x their median

    New from @CBSNews: Some of the highest-ranking officials in the U.S. military were subjected to polygraph tests as part of a sweeping leak probe after highly sensitive classified details about the nation's stockpiles of sophisticated weapons were reported in the media. President Trump was furious about the leaks. A very small set of people had access to the classified details on the munitions, and there was concern about whether anyone could potentially be acting as a foreign intelligence asset, one of the sources said. Polygraph tests are often a part of the routine cadence for top military and civilian officials, but the mass volume of people who were pulled in for testing in this case was extremely rare. @JimLaPorta @ellee_watson and me: https://t.co/zO7G0tmxr9

    54315910031139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202610x their median

    NEWS: Army Secretary Dan Driscoll has submitted his resignation to President Trump following months of tension with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the direction of the service and the ouster of numerous senior Army officers. He is expected to leave the Pentagon in the coming days https://t.co/flaQQ9StPw @mgordonwsj @MarcusReports

    4671893737278K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.3x their median

    Asked when United States will see its first barrel of oil from the deal for US to access somewhere around 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil reserves, @VP told me: "It's a mistake to say when will we see increased production because we're already seeing increased production." https://t.co/FXydG2Wdwo

    2283915323162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.1x their median

    News: Some airline passengers may be able to bring water bottles through security at a select number of airports in the coming months. TSA is actively considering allowing this for TSA PreCheck passengers at airports with newer screening technology that can distinguish water from other liquids/potential threats.  @NicoleSganga @CBSNews

    28939161378K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20264.7x their median

    Hegseth calls for military bases to generate their own power and get off the civilian grid to avoid cyber attack or grid paralysis. The department of war will be the insurance policy for the entire nation, he said https://t.co/rXFfuD1rpc

    23846242252K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.3x their median

    "If you have a disagreement with somebody politically, even over a deeply held issue, you should still be friends with that person because the whole republic depends on people of different perspectives being able to talk to one another," @VP JD Vance says at White House press briefing.

    9919961766K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.8x their median

    Trump's departure to Dallas for midterms convention a bit delayed because of the inflatable slide on the AF1 gifted from Qatar. "They're checking the slide," Trump told us. "They want to make sure everything works perfectly." https://t.co/2spiHWGCix

    1333223857K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.6x their median

    Exclusive: The Trump administration told Germany and France to draw down emergency diesel inventories to help ease soaring global fuel prices or face a potential US diesel export ban, according to three people close to the discussions https://t.co/HCs2Fe6ZZW https://t.co/VjPoTtzgHe

    9944271570K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.5x their median

    Trump signs EO directing Interior Dept to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America.

    7825452888K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.4x their median

    Three people will study the future of war under new Pentagon initiative: Elon Musk, Palmer Lucky and Newt Gingrich "to achieve military dominance for decades," Hegseth says. Their ideas will be due in 120 days. https://t.co/unGq2ZL4bl

    5127652538K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai#flydubai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 364K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.411% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 833 interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #flydubai.

What is Jennifer Jacobs's engagement rate on X?
Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 364,090 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Jennifer Jacobs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JenniferJJacobs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JenniferJJacobs post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going