Jennifer Jacobs engagement report
@JenniferJJacobs - 364K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 364K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.411% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 833 interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #flydubai.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #flydubai.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jennifer Jacobs's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.019%, Jennifer Jacobs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 62% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 31% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 388 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202612x their median
New from @CBSNews: Some of the highest-ranking officials in the U.S. military were subjected to polygraph tests as part of a sweeping leak probe after highly sensitive classified details about the nation's stockpiles of sophisticated weapons were reported in the media. President Trump was furious about the leaks. A very small set of people had access to the classified details on the munitions, and there was concern about whether anyone could potentially be acting as a foreign intelligence asset, one of the sources said. Polygraph tests are often a part of the routine cadence for top military and civilian officials, but the mass volume of people who were pulled in for testing in this case was extremely rare. @JimLaPorta @ellee_watson and me: https://t.co/zO7G0tmxr9
- Aug 31, 202610x their median
NEWS: Army Secretary Dan Driscoll has submitted his resignation to President Trump following months of tension with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the direction of the service and the ouster of numerous senior Army officers. He is expected to leave the Pentagon in the coming days https://t.co/flaQQ9StPw @mgordonwsj @MarcusReports
- Aug 31, 20266.3x their median
Asked when United States will see its first barrel of oil from the deal for US to access somewhere around 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil reserves, @VP told me: "It's a mistake to say when will we see increased production because we're already seeing increased production." https://t.co/FXydG2Wdwo
- Sep 9, 20265.1x their median
News: Some airline passengers may be able to bring water bottles through security at a select number of airports in the coming months. TSA is actively considering allowing this for TSA PreCheck passengers at airports with newer screening technology that can distinguish water from other liquids/potential threats. @NicoleSganga @CBSNews
- Sep 30, 20264.7x their median
Hegseth calls for military bases to generate their own power and get off the civilian grid to avoid cyber attack or grid paralysis. The department of war will be the insurance policy for the entire nation, he said https://t.co/rXFfuD1rpc
- Sep 3, 20263.3x their median
"If you have a disagreement with somebody politically, even over a deeply held issue, you should still be friends with that person because the whole republic depends on people of different perspectives being able to talk to one another," @VP JD Vance says at White House press briefing.
- Sep 9, 20262.8x their median
Trump's departure to Dallas for midterms convention a bit delayed because of the inflatable slide on the AF1 gifted from Qatar. "They're checking the slide," Trump told us. "They want to make sure everything works perfectly." https://t.co/2spiHWGCix
- Oct 1, 20262.6x their median
Exclusive: The Trump administration told Germany and France to draw down emergency diesel inventories to help ease soaring global fuel prices or face a potential US diesel export ban, according to three people close to the discussions https://t.co/HCs2Fe6ZZW https://t.co/VjPoTtzgHe
- Aug 27, 20262.5x their median
Trump signs EO directing Interior Dept to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America.
- Sep 30, 20262.4x their median
Three people will study the future of war under new Pentagon initiative: Elon Musk, Palmer Lucky and Newt Gingrich "to achieve military dominance for decades," Hegseth says. Their ideas will be due in 120 days. https://t.co/unGq2ZL4bl
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 364K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.411% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 833 interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #flydubai.
- What is Jennifer Jacobs's engagement rate on X?
- Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 364,090 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.019%, Jennifer Jacobs sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JenniferJJacobs have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JenniferJJacobs post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.7 posts per day across the measured window.