PlayerSells
Back to @JayzTwoCents's profile

JayzTwoCents engagement report

@JayzTwoCents - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
0.431%
55K views on a typical post
Reach
3.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
236
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 236 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 0.431% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

JayzTwoCents's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, JayzTwoCents sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link94% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%8.9K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 94% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 2, 202614x their median

    I'm sorry. But I know this is going to ruffle a lot of feathers but I just have to. With World Cup back in the US for the first time since 1994, I've been trying to watch it but I just can't. It's the flopping... I mean I understand the tactic, I understand it's to draw penalties but it drives me crazy. I mean it's like a fly landed on them and they are writhing in pain on the ground, the trainers run out and start "working" on the player and then suddenly he's fine and back up and running again. And we are all watching the replay going "really?" You see I am a Hockey fan. In fact my house is a hockey house. The sport where if you aren't dead, you're on the ice with fresh stitches, missing teeth etc. in fact, in hockey if you "act" a fool when a physical penalty is assessed YOU get an additional penalty for "embellishment" - it's glorious. I'm sure this is one of those things where the sport has evolved small increments at a time regarding penalties but I just can't take the flipping serious. It makes me watch the sport thinking these are the softest people on the planet..... well there's basketball but that's a different tweet on a different day. Look, to each their own, but I just can't. It's just pathetic and as I write this no less than 4 penalties were assessed and the "trainers" are currently tending to a player who a butterfly flew too close to. So since I dished it, means I have to also take it.... can't wait to hear how "dumb" hockey is.

    2.6K5865027418K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20269.5x their median

    So regarding the LG monitor adware being automatically installed on systems with an LG monitor, my system at home runs 2 MSI OLEDs and NOT an LG.... rumor has it the motherboard may contain the LG drivers which can trigger the download.... So don't think you're safe just because you don't have an LG.

    2.1K88866188K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20263.4x their median

    Not a bad first prototype. I never would have expected to be teaching myself how to model and cnc as fast as I am but I'm sure having fun! https://t.co/VG3aCwZVuy

    7462037144K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20262.7x their median

    Samsung, SK Hynix being Investigated for Price Fixing! - Weekly News https://t.co/SgKcAUVZtV https://t.co/YvPOYEtcLM

    5565519352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.9x their median

    I put 128GB of RAM in the Steam Machine... Here's what happened https://t.co/Y91RAeh219 https://t.co/FnNbmmCamT

    3783832257K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20261.8x their median

    Look who (after 14 years) has finally decided to try and make his own waterblock! https://t.co/7rmWznExGz

    3811424037K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20261.8x their median

    Micron's corruption has no limits - Weekly News https://t.co/Sti9MKKGKG

    361447264K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20261.7x their median

    This tiny PC DESTROYS the Steam Machine (and doesn't use Windows!) https://t.co/iq7ZbU5pHc https://t.co/1gadf9dhfB

    3552721552K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.7x their median

    This GPU Utility unlocks ALL your GPU Performance! RIP Afterburner... https://t.co/TPbhkgnEgh

    3562711053K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20261.7x their median

    My Salty Opinion of the Steam Machine... *Rant* https://t.co/3ax8eOTH5c https://t.co/1NytSrxHNP

    3252243144K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 236 interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 55K times each, and 0.431% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 94% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is JayzTwoCents's engagement rate on X?
JayzTwoCents (@JayzTwoCents) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,560,661 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, JayzTwoCents sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JayzTwoCents have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JayzTwoCents post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going