Back to @JayMcGuiness's profile

Jay McGuiness engagement report

@JayMcGuiness - 563K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 563K followers
Per impression
0.076%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
2.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 563K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.076% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 112x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #masterchef, #celebritymasterchef.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #masterchef, #celebritymasterchef.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jay McGuiness's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Jay McGuiness sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,037 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Feb 1, 2024112x their median

    Well, she's out today! I look like I'm posing with a new car... & I feel at a loss for words. Thank you so much to those who have picked up a copy of Blood Flowers. I hope she takes you on a little whirlwind adventure. And did you know, she isn't an autobiography? Very lucky boy. https://t.co/OMEism86LP

    90630710520144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202634x their median

    🌟 Rest in peace Dolly 🌟 https://t.co/EdVoVlDhjS

    366301338.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202629x their median

    Ancient 'Robin Hood' tree is dead, experts say https://t.co/Jvrp5slxRA

    228554228196K viewsView on X
  • May 24, 202628x their median

    Dang Niall can really write a song huh? https://t.co/vp8rOIj60T

    2832718314K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202619x their median

    😭🇪🇸♥️💛♥️ vivaaaaaaa

    170262939.2K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 202619x their median

    So the president of the USA has gone beyond power mad? He’s obviously a thin-skinned warmongering wrongun, but I don’t understand how the structure that surrounds the presidency has allowed it to go this far? Is none of this criminal? If not, it should be. God help us all. 🫠 https://t.co/VFSt063779

    163263305.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202618x their median

    Weird how running slowly turns from “I should do this to maintain fitness I guess…” to “This is a vital time that I cherish, time where I do some of my best pondering & processing, and is now an absolutely necessary ritual that I need to feel like myself.” Let’s run baby. https://t.co/eGoCOXe0Wg

    1811125118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202617x their median

    Thought loading … https://t.co/wSHiO7THZ4

    168121807.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202616x their median

    LET’S GOOOOOOOO #VivaEspaña https://t.co/Tmab5JcIyP

    152221717.5K viewsView on X
  • Mar 1, 202616x their median

    Off we go! 🌊🧜‍♀️ https://t.co/7Ubx8XlrIg

    140113925.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#masterchef#celebritymasterchef

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 563K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.076% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 112x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #masterchef, #celebritymasterchef.

What is Jay McGuiness's engagement rate on X?
Jay McGuiness (@JayMcGuiness) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 563,023 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Jay McGuiness sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JayMcGuiness have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JayMcGuiness post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going